The Parallelogram Law

An identity hides between the two diagonals and the two sides of a parallelogram. This scene slides the exponent pp and checks when that identity survives. Every norm that comes from an inner product satisfies the identity. Computing with e1e_1 and e2e_2 makes the left side 2β‹…22/p2 \cdot 2^{2/p} and the right side 44. The two agree only at p=2p = 2. So an β„“p\ell^p norm with pp different from 2 cannot come from any inner product. For example, a πŸ“ parallelogram drawn with a ruler stays exactly the same, but the measuring ruler is swapped. If swapping the ruler alone breaks the diagonal identity, that ruler never came from an inner-product blueprint.

βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯2+βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯2=2βˆ₯xβˆ₯2+2βˆ₯yβˆ₯2\|x+y\|^2 + \|x-y\|^2 = 2\|x\|^2 + 2\|y\|^2
⟨x,y⟩=βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯2βˆ’βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯24\langle x, y \rangle = \frac{\|x+y\|^2 - \|x-y\|^2}{4}

Examples & Exercises

Prove completely that in a real inner product space, every x,yx, y satisfies the parallelogram law βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯2+βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯2=2βˆ₯xβˆ₯2+2βˆ₯yβˆ₯2\|x+y\|^2 + \|x-y\|^2 = 2\|x\|^2 + 2\|y\|^2.

βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯2+βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯2=2βˆ₯xβˆ₯2+2βˆ₯yβˆ₯2\|x+y\|^2 + \|x-y\|^2 = 2\|x\|^2 + 2\|y\|^2
p=2p = 2: the Euclidean norm comes from an inner product, and the left side =4== 4 = the right side β€” the case where the parallelogram law holds.
Show proof
  1. Expand the norm of the sum through the inner product. In a real inner product space βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯2=⟨x+y,x+y⟩\|x+y\|^2 = \langle x+y, x+y \rangle, and bilinearity with symmetry gives ⟨x+y,x+y⟩=⟨x,x⟩+⟨x,y⟩+⟨y,x⟩+⟨y,y⟩=βˆ₯xβˆ₯2+2⟨x,y⟩+βˆ₯yβˆ₯2\langle x+y, x+y \rangle = \langle x, x \rangle + \langle x, y \rangle + \langle y, x \rangle + \langle y, y \rangle = \|x\|^2 + 2\langle x, y \rangle + \|y\|^2. That is, βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯2=βˆ₯xβˆ₯2+2⟨x,y⟩+βˆ₯yβˆ₯2\|x+y\|^2 = \|x\|^2 + 2\langle x, y \rangle + \|y\|^2.
  2. Expand the norm of the difference the same way. βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯2=⟨xβˆ’y,xβˆ’y⟩=⟨x,xβŸ©βˆ’βŸ¨x,yβŸ©βˆ’βŸ¨y,x⟩+⟨y,y⟩=βˆ₯xβˆ₯2βˆ’2⟨x,y⟩+βˆ₯yβˆ₯2\|x-y\|^2 = \langle x-y, x-y \rangle = \langle x, x \rangle - \langle x, y \rangle - \langle y, x \rangle + \langle y, y \rangle = \|x\|^2 - 2\langle x, y \rangle + \|y\|^2. That is, βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯2=βˆ₯xβˆ₯2βˆ’2⟨x,y⟩+βˆ₯yβˆ₯2\|x-y\|^2 = \|x\|^2 - 2\langle x, y \rangle + \|y\|^2.
  3. Add the two identities. The cross terms cancel: βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯2+βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯2=(βˆ₯xβˆ₯2+2⟨x,y⟩+βˆ₯yβˆ₯2)+(βˆ₯xβˆ₯2βˆ’2⟨x,y⟩+βˆ₯yβˆ₯2)=2βˆ₯xβˆ₯2+2βˆ₯yβˆ₯2\|x+y\|^2 + \|x-y\|^2 = \left(\|x\|^2 + 2\langle x, y \rangle + \|y\|^2\right) + \left(\|x\|^2 - 2\langle x, y \rangle + \|y\|^2\right) = 2\|x\|^2 + 2\|y\|^2. This is the parallelogram law, and the proof is complete.
  4. Remark: this is the real case. The law itself also holds in complex inner product spaces by the same expansion, but the polarization identity in problem 3 below changes to a form using Re\mathrm{Re} there β€” not needed here.

For e1=(1,0)e_1 = (1,0) and e2=(0,1)e_2 = (0,1) in ℓp(R2)\ell^p(\mathbb{R}^2), compute both sides of the parallelogram law and prove completely that equality holds only when p=2p = 2. Conclude that for p≠2p \ne 2 the ℓp\ell^p norm is not induced by any inner product.

βˆ₯e1+e2βˆ₯p2+βˆ₯e1βˆ’e2βˆ₯p2=21+2/p,2βˆ₯e1βˆ₯p2+2βˆ₯e2βˆ₯p2=4=22\|e_1+e_2\|_p^2 + \|e_1-e_2\|_p^2 = 2^{1 + 2/p}, \qquad 2\|e_1\|_p^2 + 2\|e_2\|_p^2 = 4 = 2^2
p=3p = 3: the left side =25/3β‰ˆ3.1748= 2^{5/3} \approx 3.1748, the right side =4= 4 β€” the parallelogram law visibly fails.
Show proof
  1. Compute each norm first. Since e1+e2=(1,1)e_1 + e_2 = (1,1), βˆ₯e1+e2βˆ₯p=(∣1∣p+∣1∣p)1/p=21/p\|e_1+e_2\|_p = \left(|1|^p + |1|^p\right)^{1/p} = 2^{1/p}, and squaring gives βˆ₯e1+e2βˆ₯p2=(21/p)2=22/p\|e_1+e_2\|_p^2 = \left(2^{1/p}\right)^2 = 2^{2/p}. Likewise e1βˆ’e2=(1,βˆ’1)e_1 - e_2 = (1,-1), so βˆ₯e1βˆ’e2βˆ₯p=(∣1∣p+βˆ£βˆ’1∣p)1/p=21/p\|e_1-e_2\|_p = \left(|1|^p + |-1|^p\right)^{1/p} = 2^{1/p} and βˆ₯e1βˆ’e2βˆ₯p2=22/p\|e_1-e_2\|_p^2 = 2^{2/p}.
  2. Collect both sides. The left side is βˆ₯e1+e2βˆ₯p2+βˆ₯e1βˆ’e2βˆ₯p2=22/p+22/p=2β‹…22/p=21+2/p\|e_1+e_2\|_p^2 + \|e_1-e_2\|_p^2 = 2^{2/p} + 2^{2/p} = 2 \cdot 2^{2/p} = 2^{1 + 2/p}. Meanwhile βˆ₯e1βˆ₯p=βˆ₯e2βˆ₯p=1\|e_1\|_p = \|e_2\|_p = 1, so the right side is 2βˆ₯e1βˆ₯p2+2βˆ₯e2βˆ₯p2=2β‹…1+2β‹…1=4=222\|e_1\|_p^2 + 2\|e_2\|_p^2 = 2 \cdot 1 + 2 \cdot 1 = 4 = 2^2. Hence equality is equivalent to 21+2/p=222^{1 + 2/p} = 2^2.
  3. (β‡’)(\Rightarrow) Suppose equality 21+2/p=222^{1 + 2/p} = 2^2 holds. The map t↦2tt \mapsto 2^t is injective, so the exponents must agree: 1+2/p=21 + 2/p = 2. Hence 2/p=12/p = 1, i.e. p=2p = 2.
  4. (⇐)(\Leftarrow) Conversely, suppose p=2p = 2. Then 1+2/p=1+1=21 + 2/p = 1 + 1 = 2, so the left side is 21+2/p=22=42^{1 + 2/p} = 2^2 = 4, directly equal to the right side 44. Hence equality holds.
  5. Conclusion: for p≠2p \ne 2 the ℓp\ell^p norm violates the parallelogram law. Since problem 1 shows that every inner-product norm satisfies the law, by the Jordan-von Neumann theorem the ℓp\ell^p norm for p≠2p \ne 2 is not induced by any inner product.

Verify completely that in a real inner product space the polarization identity ⟨x,y⟩=βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯2βˆ’βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯24\langle x, y \rangle = \frac{\|x+y\|^2 - \|x-y\|^2}{4} holds.

⟨x,y⟩=βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯2βˆ’βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯24\langle x, y \rangle = \frac{\|x+y\|^2 - \|x-y\|^2}{4}
p=2p = 2: the Euclidean case, where the parallelogram law holds β€” the polarization identity reads the inner product back off the norm.
Show proof
  1. Reuse the expansions from problem 1: βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯2=βˆ₯xβˆ₯2+2⟨x,y⟩+βˆ₯yβˆ₯2\|x+y\|^2 = \|x\|^2 + 2\langle x, y \rangle + \|y\|^2 and βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯2=βˆ₯xβˆ₯2βˆ’2⟨x,y⟩+βˆ₯yβˆ₯2\|x-y\|^2 = \|x\|^2 - 2\langle x, y \rangle + \|y\|^2.
  2. Subtract the two identities. The βˆ₯xβˆ₯2\|x\|^2 and βˆ₯yβˆ₯2\|y\|^2 terms disappear and only the cross terms survive: βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯2βˆ’βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯2=(βˆ₯xβˆ₯2+2⟨x,y⟩+βˆ₯yβˆ₯2)βˆ’(βˆ₯xβˆ₯2βˆ’2⟨x,y⟩+βˆ₯yβˆ₯2)=4⟨x,y⟩\|x+y\|^2 - \|x-y\|^2 = \left(\|x\|^2 + 2\langle x, y \rangle + \|y\|^2\right) - \left(\|x\|^2 - 2\langle x, y \rangle + \|y\|^2\right) = 4\langle x, y \rangle.
  3. Divide both sides by 44: βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯2βˆ’βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯24=⟨x,y⟩\frac{\|x+y\|^2 - \|x-y\|^2}{4} = \langle x, y \rangle β€” the polarization identity is verified. The inner product is completely determined by the norm alone.
  4. By the Jordan-von Neumann theorem, whenever a norm satisfies the parallelogram law, this very formula defines an inner product for it (statement only).

3. Sequences