Hölder’s Inequality

∑∣akbk∣≤∥a∥p∥b∥q\sum |a_k b_k| \le \|a\|_p \|b\|_q (1p+1q=1\frac1p + \frac1q = 1) — Cauchy–Schwarz is the case p=q=2p = q = 2. Proved via Young's inequality.

∑k=1n∣akbk∣≤(∑k=1n∣ak∣p)1/p(∑k=1n∣bk∣q)1/q\sum_{k=1}^{n} |a_k b_k| \le \left(\sum_{k=1}^{n} |a_k|^p\right)^{1/p} \left(\sum_{k=1}^{n} |b_k|^q\right)^{1/q}
ab≤app+bqq(Young)ab \le \frac{a^p}{p} + \frac{b^q}{q} \quad \text{(Young)}

Examples & Exercises

For conjugate exponents 1/p+1/q=11/p + 1/q = 1 (1<p,q<∞1 < p, q < \infty), prove Young's inequality ab≤app+bqqab \le \frac{a^p}{p} + \frac{b^q}{q} (a,b≥0a, b \ge 0) completely, using the concavity of log⁡\log.

ab≤app+bqq,equality  ⟺  ap=bqab \le \frac{a^p}{p} + \frac{b^q}{q}, \qquad \text{equality} \iff a^p = b^q
p=2p = 2, n=8n = 8: Young's inequality feeds each term akbk≤ak22+bk22a_k b_k \le \frac{a_k^2}{2} + \frac{b_k^2}{2}, and summing gives Hölder (Cauchy–Schwarz).
Show proof
  1. If a=0a = 0 or b=0b = 0 both sides are trivial (0≤0 \le the right side), so take a,b>0a, b > 0. Then ab=exp⁡(log⁡a+log⁡b)=exp⁡(1plog⁡(ap)+1qlog⁡(bq))ab = \exp(\log a + \log b) = \exp\left(\frac{1}{p}\log(a^p) + \frac{1}{q}\log(b^q)\right). Since log⁡\log is concave, the weighted Jensen inequality log⁡(Xp+Yq)≥1plog⁡X+1qlog⁡Y\log\left(\frac{X}{p} + \frac{Y}{q}\right) \ge \frac{1}{p}\log X + \frac{1}{q}\log Y (X,Y>0X, Y > 0) holds.
  2. With X=apX = a^p, Y=bqY = b^q this gives 1plog⁡(ap)+1qlog⁡(bq)≤log⁡(app+bqq)\frac{1}{p}\log(a^p) + \frac{1}{q}\log(b^q) \le \log\left(\frac{a^p}{p} + \frac{b^q}{q}\right). Applying the monotone exp⁡\exp to both sides, exp⁡(1plog⁡(ap)+1qlog⁡(bq))=ab≤app+bqq\exp\left(\frac{1}{p}\log(a^p) + \frac{1}{q}\log(b^q)\right) = ab \le \frac{a^p}{p} + \frac{b^q}{q} — Young's inequality proved.
  3. Equality case: log⁡\log is strictly concave, so Jensen gives equality only when X=YX = Y, i.e. ap=bqa^p = b^q. This equality condition becomes Hölder's equality case in problem 3 below.

Derive Hölder's inequality ∑k=1n∣akbk∣≤(∑∣ak∣p)1/p(∑∣bk∣q)1/q\sum_{k=1}^{n} |a_k b_k| \le \left(\sum |a_k|^p\right)^{1/p}\left(\sum |b_k|^q\right)^{1/q} completely from Young's inequality by the normalization argument.

∑AkBk≤∑(Akpp+Bkqq)=1p+1q=1\sum A_k B_k \le \sum\left(\frac{A_k^p}{p} + \frac{B_k^q}{q}\right) = \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = 1
p=3p = 3 (q=1.5q = 1.5), n=8n = 8: left side H8≈2.7179H_8 \approx 2.7179, right side ≈4.245\approx 4.245 — the gap is positive and the inequality holds.
Show proof
  1. If ∥a∥p=0\|a\|_p = 0 then every ak=0a_k = 0 and both sides are 0; likewise for ∥b∥q=0\|b\|_q = 0. So assume ∥a∥p,∥b∥q>0\|a\|_p, \|b\|_q > 0. Define the normalized sequences Ak=∣ak∣/∥a∥pA_k = |a_k|/\|a\|_p, Bk=∣bk∣/∥b∥qB_k = |b_k|/\|b\|_q; then ∑Akp=1\sum A_k^p = 1 and ∑Bkq=1\sum B_k^q = 1.
  2. Apply Young's inequality to each kk: AkBk≤Akpp+BkqqA_k B_k \le \frac{A_k^p}{p} + \frac{B_k^q}{q}. Summing over k=1,…,nk = 1, \dots, n gives ∑AkBk≤1p∑Akp+1q∑Bkq=1p+1q=1\sum A_k B_k \le \frac{1}{p}\sum A_k^p + \frac{1}{q}\sum B_k^q = \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = 1.
  3. Multiplying both sides by ∥a∥p∥b∥q\|a\|_p\|b\|_q gives ∑∣akbk∣=∥a∥p∥b∥q∑AkBk≤∥a∥p∥b∥q\sum |a_k b_k| = \|a\|_p\|b\|_q \sum A_k B_k \le \|a\|_p\|b\|_q — Hölder's inequality proved. The case p=q=2p = q = 2 is Cauchy–Schwarz. Sliding pp in the scene shows how this right side inflates and deflates.

Prove that equality in Hölder's inequality holds exactly when ∣ak∣p|a_k|^p is proportional to ∣bk∣q|b_k|^q: ∣ak∣p=C ∣bk∣q|a_k|^p = C\,|b_k|^q for all kk and some constant C≥0C \ge 0.

equality in Ho¨lder  ⟺  Akp=Bkq  ∀k  ⟺  ∣ak∣p=C ∣bk∣q\text{equality in Hölder} \iff A_k^p = B_k^q \;\forall k \iff |a_k|^p = C\,|b_k|^q
p=2p = 2, n=8n = 8: ak=1/ka_k = 1/k is not proportional to the constant sequence bk=1b_k = 1, so the gap is nonzero — showing why the equality condition fails.
Show proof
  1. In problem 2's proof the inequality happened in exactly one place: Young's inequality AkBk≤Akpp+BkqqA_k B_k \le \frac{A_k^p}{p} + \frac{B_k^q}{q} applied to each term (its sum 1p∑Akp+1q∑Bkq=1\frac{1}{p}\sum A_k^p + \frac{1}{q}\sum B_k^q = 1 is an identity). So equality overall holds if and only if Young's inequality is an equality for every kk.
  2. By problem 1's equality condition, this is equivalent to Akp=BkqA_k^p = B_k^q for every kk. Unwinding Ak=∣ak∣/∥a∥pA_k = |a_k|/\|a\|_p, Bk=∣bk∣/∥b∥qB_k = |b_k|/\|b\|_q gives ∣ak∣p∥a∥pp=∣bk∣q∥b∥qq\frac{|a_k|^p}{\|a\|_p^p} = \frac{|b_k|^q}{\|b\|_q^q} — i.e. ∣ak∣p=C ∣bk∣q|a_k|^p = C\,|b_k|^q with C=∥a∥pp/∥b∥qq≥0C = \|a\|_p^p/\|b\|_q^q \ge 0 independent of kk.
  3. The converse holds too: ∣ak∣p=C∣bk∣q|a_k|^p = C|b_k|^q gives Akp=BkqA_k^p = B_k^q after normalization, making every Young's inequality an equality. In the scene, ak=1/ka_k = 1/k is not constant, so with bk=1b_k = 1 the gap can never be 0 — the gap closing as p→1+p \to 1^+ is a collapse of the right side itself, not proportionality.

2. Sequences