Changing the integrator — ∫abfdα weighs intervals by Δαi=α(xi)−α(xi−1) instead of length. α(x)=x recovers Riemann sums, a step α collapses to a single jump, α(x)=x2 gives ∫fα′dx.
U(f,P,α)=∑MiΔαi
∫abfdα
Examples & Exercises
Show that when α(x)=x, the Riemann–Stieltjes upper/lower sums coincide exactly with the Riemann upper/lower sums, and prove that if one integral exists then so does the other, with the same value.
Δαi=xi−xi−1=Δxi⇒U(f,P,α)=U(f,P)
∫abfdα=∫abfdx(α(x)=x)
α(x)=x, n=6: the top and bottom panels draw identically — U=127≈0.5833, L=125≈0.4167, exact 21.Show proof
When α(x)=x, Δαi=α(xi)−α(xi−1)=xi−xi−1=Δxi. Hence the RS upper sum U(f,P,α)=∑MiΔαi matches ∑MiΔxi=U(f,P) term by term, and likewise for the lower sums.
So the RS upper integral ∫abfdα=infPU(f,P,α) equals the Riemann upper integral infPU(f,P), and likewise below. If f is Riemann integrable, the upper and lower integrals agree, hence the RS integral exists with ∫abfdα=∫abfdx — and conversely.
In other words, α(x)=x is the choice that does not change the "measuring stick" — which is why, in the scene with α set to identity, the lower α-panel overlaps the upper Riemann panel exactly.
Let α have a single jump of size J at c and be constant elsewhere, and let f be continuous at c. Prove completely, by a squeezing argument on the interval straddling the jump, that ∫abfdα=f(c)J.
U(f,P,α)=MIJ,L(f,P,α)=mIJ⇒∫abfdα=f(c)J
Step α (c=21, J=1), n=6: all zero-width bars vanish, leaving only [62,63] straddling the jump — U=21, L=31, exact f(21)⋅1=21.Show proof
For any partition P, intervals with Δαi=0 contribute nothing to the RS sums. Whether c is a partition point xk or lies inside an interval, exactly one interval has Δαi=J — the interval I=[xk−1,xk] straddling c (the value of α changes at only one endpoint). Hence U(f,P,α)=MIJ and L(f,P,α)=mIJ, where MI,mI are the sup/inf of f on I.
Since f is continuous at c, for every ε>0 there is δ>0 with ∣x−c∣<δ⇒∣f(x)−f(c)∣<ε/J. If the partition mesh is below δ, then I⊂(c−δ,c+δ), so ∣MI−f(c)∣≤ε/J and ∣mI−f(c)∣≤ε/J. Hence ∣U(f,P,α)−f(c)J∣≤ε and U−L=(MI−mI)J≤2ε.
Since ε is arbitrary, both the RS upper and lower integrals converge to f(c)J — the integral exists and ∫abfdα=f(c)J. A jump collapses the integral to "function value at the point × jump size": why the scene's step α gives f(21)⋅1=21.
Let α be C1 and increasing on [a,b] and f continuous. Write Δαi=α′(ξi)Δxi by the mean value theorem, and complete the standard argument — using uniform continuity to trade the ξi for sample points — proving ∫abfdα=∫abf(x)α′(x)dx.
U(f,P,α)=∑Miα′(ξi)Δximesh→0∫abf(x)α′(x)dx
α(x)=x2, n=12: U and L converge to the exact ∫01x⋅2xdx=32≈0.6667 — the Riemann integral weighted by α′=2x.Show proof
By the mean value theorem, each [xi−1,xi] holds ξi∈(xi−1,xi) with Δαi=α′(ξi)Δxi (α′ is continuous since α is C1). Hence U(f,P,α)=∑Miα′(ξi)Δxi; α increasing gives α′≥0 and A=max[a,b]α′<∞.
First, integrability: U−L=∑(Mi−mi)α′(ξi)Δxi≤A∑(Mi−mi)Δxi=A(U(f,P)−L(f,P)). Since f is continuous it is Riemann integrable, and U(f,P)−L(f,P)→0 as the mesh →0 — so U(f,P,α)−L(f,P,α)→0, and the RS integral ∫abfdα exists.
Now compare U(f,P,α) with the Riemann sum S(P)=∑f(ti)α′(ti)Δxi (sample points ti∈[xi−1,xi], e.g. ti=xi−1). From ∣Miα′(ξi)−f(ti)α′(ti)∣≤∣Mi−f(ti)∣α′(ξi)+∣f(ti)∣∣α′(ξi)−α′(ti)∣, with F=max[a,b]∣f∣, we get ∣U(f,P,α)−S(P)∣≤Aωf(δ)(b−a)+Fωα′(δ)(b−a), where ωf,ωα′ are the moduli of continuity from uniform continuity and δ is the mesh.
As δ→0, ωf(δ),ωα′(δ)→0, so ∣U(f,P,α)−S(P)∣→0. Since fα′ is continuous, S(P)→∫abf(x)α′(x)dx, and U(f,P,α)→∫abfdα (RS integrability shown above); the two limits must agree: ∫abfdα=∫abf(x)α′(x)dx. Every step is complete — nothing is left at idea level.