The Riemann–Stieltjes Integral

Changing the integrator — ∫abf dα\int_a^b f\,d\alpha weighs intervals by Δαi=α(xi)−α(xi−1)\Delta\alpha_i = \alpha(x_i) - \alpha(x_{i-1}) instead of length. α(x)=x\alpha(x) = x recovers Riemann sums, a step α\alpha collapses to a single jump, α(x)=x2\alpha(x) = x^2 gives ∫fα′ dx\int f\alpha'\,dx.

U(f,P,α)=∑Mi ΔαiU(f,P,\alpha) = \sum M_i\,\Delta\alpha_i
∫abf dα\int_a^b f\,d\alpha

Examples & Exercises

Show that when α(x)=x\alpha(x) = x, the Riemann–Stieltjes upper/lower sums coincide exactly with the Riemann upper/lower sums, and prove that if one integral exists then so does the other, with the same value.

Δαi=xi−xi−1=Δxi  ⇒  U(f,P,α)=U(f,P)\Delta\alpha_i = x_i - x_{i-1} = \Delta x_i \;\Rightarrow\; U(f, P, \alpha) = U(f, P)
∫abf dα=∫abf dx(α(x)=x)\int_a^b f\,d\alpha = \int_a^b f\,dx \quad (\alpha(x) = x)
α(x)=x\alpha(x) = x, n=6n = 6: the top and bottom panels draw identically — U=712≈0.5833U = \frac{7}{12} \approx 0.5833, L=512≈0.4167L = \frac{5}{12} \approx 0.4167, exact 12\frac12.
Show proof
  1. When α(x)=x\alpha(x) = x, Δαi=α(xi)−α(xi−1)=xi−xi−1=Δxi\Delta\alpha_i = \alpha(x_i) - \alpha(x_{i-1}) = x_i - x_{i-1} = \Delta x_i. Hence the RS upper sum U(f,P,α)=∑Mi ΔαiU(f, P, \alpha) = \sum M_i\,\Delta\alpha_i matches ∑Mi Δxi=U(f,P)\sum M_i\,\Delta x_i = U(f, P) term by term, and likewise for the lower sums.
  2. So the RS upper integral ∫ab‾f dα=inf⁡PU(f,P,α)\overline{\int_a^b} f\,d\alpha = \inf_P U(f, P, \alpha) equals the Riemann upper integral inf⁡PU(f,P)\inf_P U(f, P), and likewise below. If ff is Riemann integrable, the upper and lower integrals agree, hence the RS integral exists with ∫abf dα=∫abf dx\int_a^b f\,d\alpha = \int_a^b f\,dx — and conversely.
  3. In other words, α(x)=x\alpha(x) = x is the choice that does not change the "measuring stick" — which is why, in the scene with α\alpha set to identity, the lower α\alpha-panel overlaps the upper Riemann panel exactly.

Let α\alpha have a single jump of size JJ at cc and be constant elsewhere, and let ff be continuous at cc. Prove completely, by a squeezing argument on the interval straddling the jump, that ∫abf dα=f(c) J\int_a^b f\,d\alpha = f(c)\,J.

U(f,P,α)=MIJ,L(f,P,α)=mIJ  ⇒  ∫abf dα=f(c) JU(f, P, \alpha) = M_I J, \quad L(f, P, \alpha) = m_I J \;\Rightarrow\; \int_a^b f\,d\alpha = f(c)\,J
Step α\alpha (c=12c = \frac12, J=1J = 1), n=6n = 6: all zero-width bars vanish, leaving only [26,36][\frac26, \frac36] straddling the jump — U=12U = \frac12, L=13L = \frac13, exact f(12)⋅1=12f(\frac12) \cdot 1 = \frac12.
Show proof
  1. For any partition PP, intervals with Δαi=0\Delta\alpha_i = 0 contribute nothing to the RS sums. Whether cc is a partition point xkx_k or lies inside an interval, exactly one interval has Δαi=J\Delta\alpha_i = J — the interval I=[xk−1,xk]I = [x_{k-1}, x_k] straddling cc (the value of α\alpha changes at only one endpoint). Hence U(f,P,α)=MI JU(f, P, \alpha) = M_I\,J and L(f,P,α)=mI JL(f, P, \alpha) = m_I\,J, where MI,mIM_I, m_I are the sup/inf of ff on II.
  2. Since ff is continuous at cc, for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is δ>0\delta > 0 with ∣x−c∣<δ⇒∣f(x)−f(c)∣<ε/J|x - c| < \delta \Rightarrow |f(x) - f(c)| < \varepsilon/J. If the partition mesh is below δ\delta, then I⊂(c−δ,c+δ)I \subset (c - \delta, c + \delta), so ∣MI−f(c)∣≤ε/J|M_I - f(c)| \le \varepsilon/J and ∣mI−f(c)∣≤ε/J|m_I - f(c)| \le \varepsilon/J. Hence ∣U(f,P,α)−f(c)J∣≤ε|U(f, P, \alpha) - f(c)J| \le \varepsilon and U−L=(MI−mI)J≤2εU - L = (M_I - m_I)J \le 2\varepsilon.
  3. Since ε\varepsilon is arbitrary, both the RS upper and lower integrals converge to f(c)Jf(c)J — the integral exists and ∫abf dα=f(c) J\int_a^b f\,d\alpha = f(c)\,J. A jump collapses the integral to "function value at the point × jump size": why the scene's step α\alpha gives f(12)⋅1=12f(\frac12)\cdot 1 = \frac12.

Let α\alpha be C1C^1 and increasing on [a,b][a, b] and ff continuous. Write Δαi=α′(ξi) Δxi\Delta\alpha_i = \alpha'(\xi_i)\,\Delta x_i by the mean value theorem, and complete the standard argument — using uniform continuity to trade the ξi\xi_i for sample points — proving ∫abf dα=∫abf(x) α′(x) dx\int_a^b f\,d\alpha = \int_a^b f(x)\,\alpha'(x)\,dx.

U(f,P,α)=∑Mi α′(ξi) Δxi  →mesh→0  ∫abf(x) α′(x) dxU(f, P, \alpha) = \sum M_i\,\alpha'(\xi_i)\,\Delta x_i \;\xrightarrow[\text{mesh} \to 0]{}\; \int_a^b f(x)\,\alpha'(x)\,dx
α(x)=x2\alpha(x) = x^2, n=12n = 12: UU and LL converge to the exact ∫01x⋅2x dx=23≈0.6667\int_0^1 x \cdot 2x\,dx = \frac23 \approx 0.6667 — the Riemann integral weighted by α′=2x\alpha' = 2x.
Show proof
  1. By the mean value theorem, each [xi−1,xi][x_{i-1}, x_i] holds ξi∈(xi−1,xi)\xi_i \in (x_{i-1}, x_i) with Δαi=α′(ξi) Δxi\Delta\alpha_i = \alpha'(\xi_i)\,\Delta x_i (α′\alpha' is continuous since α\alpha is C1C^1). Hence U(f,P,α)=∑Mi α′(ξi) ΔxiU(f, P, \alpha) = \sum M_i\,\alpha'(\xi_i)\,\Delta x_i; α\alpha increasing gives α′≥0\alpha' \ge 0 and A=max⁡[a,b]α′<∞A = \max_{[a,b]} \alpha' < \infty.
  2. First, integrability: U−L=∑(Mi−mi) α′(ξi) Δxi≤A∑(Mi−mi) Δxi=A (U(f,P)−L(f,P))U - L = \sum (M_i - m_i)\,\alpha'(\xi_i)\,\Delta x_i \le A\sum (M_i - m_i)\,\Delta x_i = A\,(U(f, P) - L(f, P)). Since ff is continuous it is Riemann integrable, and U(f,P)−L(f,P)→0U(f, P) - L(f, P) \to 0 as the mesh →0\to 0 — so U(f,P,α)−L(f,P,α)→0U(f, P, \alpha) - L(f, P, \alpha) \to 0, and the RS integral ∫abf dα\int_a^b f\,d\alpha exists.
  3. Now compare U(f,P,α)U(f, P, \alpha) with the Riemann sum S(P)=∑f(ti) α′(ti) ΔxiS(P) = \sum f(t_i)\,\alpha'(t_i)\,\Delta x_i (sample points ti∈[xi−1,xi]t_i \in [x_{i-1}, x_i], e.g. ti=xi−1t_i = x_{i-1}). From ∣Mi α′(ξi)−f(ti) α′(ti)∣≤∣Mi−f(ti)∣ α′(ξi)+∣f(ti)∣ ∣α′(ξi)−α′(ti)∣\lvert M_i\,\alpha'(\xi_i) - f(t_i)\,\alpha'(t_i)\rvert \le \lvert M_i - f(t_i)\rvert\,\alpha'(\xi_i) + \lvert f(t_i)\rvert\,\lvert\alpha'(\xi_i) - \alpha'(t_i)\rvert, with F=max⁡[a,b]∣f∣F = \max_{[a,b]} |f|, we get ∣U(f,P,α)−S(P)∣≤A ωf(δ) (b−a)+F ωα′(δ) (b−a)\lvert U(f, P, \alpha) - S(P)\rvert \le A\,\omega_f(\delta)\,(b-a) + F\,\omega_{\alpha'}(\delta)\,(b-a), where ωf,ωα′\omega_f, \omega_{\alpha'} are the moduli of continuity from uniform continuity and δ\delta is the mesh.
  4. As δ→0\delta \to 0, ωf(δ),ωα′(δ)→0\omega_f(\delta), \omega_{\alpha'}(\delta) \to 0, so ∣U(f,P,α)−S(P)∣→0|U(f, P, \alpha) - S(P)| \to 0. Since f α′f\,\alpha' is continuous, S(P)→∫abf(x) α′(x) dxS(P) \to \int_a^b f(x)\,\alpha'(x)\,dx, and U(f,P,α)→∫abf dαU(f, P, \alpha) \to \int_a^b f\,d\alpha (RS integrability shown above); the two limits must agree: ∫abf dα=∫abf(x) α′(x) dx\int_a^b f\,d\alpha = \int_a^b f(x)\,\alpha'(x)\,dx. Every step is complete — nothing is left at idea level.

10. Integration