The Riemann–Stieltjes Integral

An integral that weighs intervals by the integrator's growth, not their length. Change the integrator and the same intervals count differently.

Each interval can carry a different weight. A step integrator dumps all its weight on one point. Then the integral is decided by that point alone.

For example, total cargo by weight, not by count, when each πŸ“¦ box weighs differently. If one box holds all the weight, it alone decides the total.

U(f,P,Ξ±)=βˆ‘Mi ΔαiU(f,P,\alpha) = \sum M_i\,\Delta\alpha_i
∫abf dΞ±\int_a^b f\,d\alpha

Examples & Exercises

Show that when Ξ±(x)=x\alpha(x) = x, the Riemann–Stieltjes upper/lower sums coincide exactly with the Riemann upper/lower sums, and prove that if one integral exists then so does the other, with the same value.

Δαi=xiβˆ’xiβˆ’1=Ξ”xiβ€…β€Šβ‡’β€…β€ŠU(f,P,Ξ±)=U(f,P)\Delta\alpha_i = x_i - x_{i-1} = \Delta x_i \;\Rightarrow\; U(f, P, \alpha) = U(f, P)
∫abf dΞ±=∫abf dx(Ξ±(x)=x)\int_a^b f\,d\alpha = \int_a^b f\,dx \quad (\alpha(x) = x)
Ξ±(x)=x\alpha(x) = x, n=6n = 6: the top and bottom panels draw identically β€” U=712β‰ˆ0.5833U = \frac{7}{12} \approx 0.5833, L=512β‰ˆ0.4167L = \frac{5}{12} \approx 0.4167, exact 12\frac12.
Show proof
  1. When Ξ±(x)=x\alpha(x) = x, Δαi=Ξ±(xi)βˆ’Ξ±(xiβˆ’1)=xiβˆ’xiβˆ’1=Ξ”xi\Delta\alpha_i = \alpha(x_i) - \alpha(x_{i-1}) = x_i - x_{i-1} = \Delta x_i. Hence the RS upper sum U(f,P,Ξ±)=βˆ‘Mi ΔαiU(f, P, \alpha) = \sum M_i\,\Delta\alpha_i matches βˆ‘Mi Δxi=U(f,P)\sum M_i\,\Delta x_i = U(f, P) term by term, and likewise for the lower sums.

  2. So the RS upper integral ∫abβ€Ύf dΞ±=inf⁑PU(f,P,Ξ±)\overline{\int_a^b} f\,d\alpha = \inf_P U(f, P, \alpha) equals the Riemann upper integral inf⁑PU(f,P)\inf_P U(f, P), and likewise below. If ff is Riemann integrable, the upper and lower integrals agree, hence the RS integral exists with ∫abf dΞ±=∫abf dx\int_a^b f\,d\alpha = \int_a^b f\,dx β€” and conversely.

  3. In other words, Ξ±(x)=x\alpha(x) = x is the choice that does not change the "measuring stick" β€” which is why, in the scene with Ξ±\alpha set to identity, the lower Ξ±\alpha-panel overlaps the upper Riemann panel exactly.

Let Ξ±\alpha have a single jump of size JJ at cc and be constant elsewhere, and let ff be continuous at cc.

Prove completely, by a squeezing argument on the interval straddling the jump, that ∫abf dΞ±=f(c) J\int_a^b f\,d\alpha = f(c)\,J.

U(f,P,Ξ±)=MIJ,L(f,P,Ξ±)=mIJβ€…β€Šβ‡’β€…β€Šβˆ«abf dΞ±=f(c) JU(f, P, \alpha) = M_I J, \quad L(f, P, \alpha) = m_I J \;\Rightarrow\; \int_a^b f\,d\alpha = f(c)\,J
Step Ξ±\alpha (c=12c = \frac12, J=1J = 1), n=6n = 6: all zero-width bars vanish, leaving only [26,36][\frac26, \frac36] straddling the jump β€” U=12U = \frac12, L=13L = \frac13, exact f(12)β‹…1=12f(\frac12) \cdot 1 = \frac12.
Show proof
  1. For any partition PP, intervals with Δαi=0\Delta\alpha_i = 0 contribute nothing to the RS sums.

    Whether cc is a partition point xkx_k or lies inside an interval, exactly one interval has Δαi=J\Delta\alpha_i = J β€” the interval I=[xkβˆ’1,xk]I = [x_{k-1}, x_k] straddling cc (the value of Ξ±\alpha changes at only one endpoint).

    Hence U(f,P,Ξ±)=MI JU(f, P, \alpha) = M_I\,J and L(f,P,Ξ±)=mI JL(f, P, \alpha) = m_I\,J, where MI,mIM_I, m_I are the sup/inf of ff on II.

  2. Since ff is continuous at cc, for every Ξ΅>0\varepsilon > 0 there is Ξ΄>0\delta > 0 with ∣xβˆ’c∣<Ξ΄β‡’βˆ£f(x)βˆ’f(c)∣<Ξ΅/J|x - c| < \delta \Rightarrow |f(x) - f(c)| < \varepsilon/J.

    If the partition mesh is below Ξ΄\delta, then IβŠ‚(cβˆ’Ξ΄,c+Ξ΄)I \subset (c - \delta, c + \delta), so ∣MIβˆ’f(c)βˆ£β‰€Ξ΅/J|M_I - f(c)| \le \varepsilon/J and ∣mIβˆ’f(c)βˆ£β‰€Ξ΅/J|m_I - f(c)| \le \varepsilon/J.

    Hence ∣U(f,P,Ξ±)βˆ’f(c)Jβˆ£β‰€Ξ΅|U(f, P, \alpha) - f(c)J| \le \varepsilon and Uβˆ’L=(MIβˆ’mI)J≀2Ξ΅U - L = (M_I - m_I)J \le 2\varepsilon.

  3. Since Ξ΅\varepsilon is arbitrary, both the RS upper and lower integrals converge to f(c)Jf(c)J β€” the integral exists and ∫abf dΞ±=f(c) J\int_a^b f\,d\alpha = f(c)\,J. A jump collapses the integral to "function value at the point Γ— jump size": why the scene's step Ξ±\alpha gives f(12)β‹…1=12f(\frac12)\cdot 1 = \frac12.

Let Ξ±\alpha be C1C^1 and increasing on [a,b][a, b] and ff continuous.

Write Δαi=Ξ±β€²(ΞΎi) Δxi\Delta\alpha_i = \alpha'(\xi_i)\,\Delta x_i by the mean value theorem, and complete the standard argument β€” using uniform continuity to trade the ΞΎi\xi_i for sample points β€” proving ∫abf dΞ±=∫abf(x) α′(x) dx\int_a^b f\,d\alpha = \int_a^b f(x)\,\alpha'(x)\,dx.

U(f,P,Ξ±)=βˆ‘Mi α′(ΞΎi) Δxiβ€…β€Šβ†’meshβ†’0β€…β€Šβˆ«abf(x) α′(x) dxU(f, P, \alpha) = \sum M_i\,\alpha'(\xi_i)\,\Delta x_i \;\xrightarrow[\text{mesh} \to 0]{}\; \int_a^b f(x)\,\alpha'(x)\,dx
Ξ±(x)=x2\alpha(x) = x^2, n=12n = 12: UU and LL converge to the exact ∫01xβ‹…2x dx=23β‰ˆ0.6667\int_0^1 x \cdot 2x\,dx = \frac23 \approx 0.6667 β€” the Riemann integral weighted by Ξ±β€²=2x\alpha' = 2x.
Show proof
  1. By the mean value theorem, each [xiβˆ’1,xi][x_{i-1}, x_i] holds ΞΎi∈(xiβˆ’1,xi)\xi_i \in (x_{i-1}, x_i) with Δαi=Ξ±β€²(ΞΎi) Δxi\Delta\alpha_i = \alpha'(\xi_i)\,\Delta x_i (Ξ±β€²\alpha' is continuous since Ξ±\alpha is C1C^1).

    Hence U(f,P,Ξ±)=βˆ‘Mi α′(ΞΎi) ΔxiU(f, P, \alpha) = \sum M_i\,\alpha'(\xi_i)\,\Delta x_i; Ξ±\alpha increasing gives Ξ±β€²β‰₯0\alpha' \ge 0.

    Since Ξ±β€²\alpha' is continuous on the compact interval [a,b][a,b], the extreme value theorem (EVT) says it attains its maximum, so A=max⁑[a,b]Ξ±β€²<∞A = \max_{[a,b]} \alpha' < \infty is legitimate.

  2. First, integrability: Uβˆ’L=βˆ‘(Miβˆ’mi) α′(ΞΎi) Δxi≀Aβˆ‘(Miβˆ’mi) Δxi=A (U(f,P)βˆ’L(f,P))U - L = \sum (M_i - m_i)\,\alpha'(\xi_i)\,\Delta x_i \le A\sum (M_i - m_i)\,\Delta x_i = A\,(U(f, P) - L(f, P)). Since ff is continuous it is Riemann integrable, and U(f,P)βˆ’L(f,P)β†’0U(f, P) - L(f, P) \to 0 as the mesh β†’0\to 0 β€” so U(f,P,Ξ±)βˆ’L(f,P,Ξ±)β†’0U(f, P, \alpha) - L(f, P, \alpha) \to 0, and the RS integral ∫abf dΞ±\int_a^b f\,d\alpha exists.

  3. Now compare U(f,P,Ξ±)U(f, P, \alpha) with the Riemann sum S(P)=βˆ‘f(ti) α′(ti) ΔxiS(P) = \sum f(t_i)\,\alpha'(t_i)\,\Delta x_i (sample points ti∈[xiβˆ’1,xi]t_i \in [x_{i-1}, x_i], e.g. ti=xiβˆ’1t_i = x_{i-1}). From ∣Mi α′(ΞΎi)βˆ’f(ti) α′(ti)βˆ£β‰€βˆ£Miβˆ’f(ti)βˆ£β€‰Ξ±β€²(ΞΎi)+∣f(ti)βˆ£β€‰βˆ£Ξ±β€²(ΞΎi)βˆ’Ξ±β€²(ti)∣\lvert M_i\,\alpha'(\xi_i) - f(t_i)\,\alpha'(t_i)\rvert \le \lvert M_i - f(t_i)\rvert\,\alpha'(\xi_i) + \lvert f(t_i)\rvert\,\lvert\alpha'(\xi_i) - \alpha'(t_i)\rvert, with F=max⁑[a,b]∣f∣F = \max_{[a,b]} |f| β€” which exists as an attained maximum by the extreme value theorem (EVT), since ff is continuous on the compact [a,b][a,b] β€” we get ∣U(f,P,Ξ±)βˆ’S(P)βˆ£β‰€A ωf(Ξ΄) (bβˆ’a)+F ωα′(Ξ΄) (bβˆ’a)\lvert U(f, P, \alpha) - S(P)\rvert \le A\,\omega_f(\delta)\,(b-a) + F\,\omega_{\alpha'}(\delta)\,(b-a), where Ο‰f,ωα′\omega_f, \omega_{\alpha'} are the moduli of continuity from uniform continuity and Ξ΄\delta is the mesh.

  4. As Ξ΄β†’0\delta \to 0, Ο‰f(Ξ΄),ωα′(Ξ΄)β†’0\omega_f(\delta), \omega_{\alpha'}(\delta) \to 0, so ∣U(f,P,Ξ±)βˆ’S(P)βˆ£β†’0|U(f, P, \alpha) - S(P)| \to 0.

    Since f α′f\,\alpha' is continuous, S(P)β†’βˆ«abf(x) α′(x) dxS(P) \to \int_a^b f(x)\,\alpha'(x)\,dx, and U(f,P,Ξ±)β†’βˆ«abf dΞ±U(f, P, \alpha) \to \int_a^b f\,d\alpha (RS integrability shown above); the two limits must agree: ∫abf dΞ±=∫abf(x) α′(x) dx\int_a^b f\,d\alpha = \int_a^b f(x)\,\alpha'(x)\,dx.

    Every step is complete β€” nothing is left at idea level.

11. Integration