Put an=nlnn(lnlnn)p1 (n≥3).
Treat only p≥0 by condensation first: for n≥3, lnlnn>0, n and lnn are positive and increasing, and for p≥0 so is (lnlnn)p; hence an decreases monotonically to 0.
The condensation test applies.
(For p<0, (lnlnn)p is decreasing and the monotonicity claim is false — e.g. for p=−1, a3≈0.0285<a4≈0.0589. The case p<0 is handled in the last step by comparison alone, with no condensation.)
First condensation: 2na2n=ln2⋅n(ln(nln2))p1. Since ln(nln2)=lnn+lnln2 with lnln2≈−0.3665, we have 21lnn≤ln(nln2)≤lnn for n≥3 (the upper bound from ln2<1; the lower from 21lnn≥−lnln2, true for n≥3).
For p>0 these two-sided bounds make the condensed series comparable, up to constants, to ∑n≥3n(lnn)p1 (comparison test).
Re-verify the condensation hypotheses for the second application: for p>0, bn=n(lnn)p1 is positive, and since n and (lnn)p are both positive and increasing, bn decreases monotonically to 0 — so condensation applies again.
Condensing again gives ∑2n⋅2n(nln2)p1=(ln2)p1∑np1, which converges only for p>1.
Hence for p>0 we get convergence when p>1 and divergence when 0<p≤1.
The case p<0 (and p=0) is handled by comparison alone — no monotonicity of the original series is needed: if n≥16 then lnlnn≥1 (since n≥ee≈15.15), so (lnlnn)p≤1 and an≥nlnn1.
Since ∑nlnn1 diverges (one condensation turns it into a constant multiple of the harmonic series), comparison gives divergence of the original series too.
Thus convergence holds if and only if p>1.