First verify the decreasing hypothesis: for xβ₯2, xlnx has derivative lnx+1>0, so xlnx is increasing and its reciprocal anβ=nlnn1β is decreasing and positive for nβ₯2.
Reindexing is also needed: the condensation in problem 1 starts at n=1 and includes a C0β term, but this series starts at n=2 and C0β=0β
ln21β is singular.
So start the condensed sum at nβ₯1 (Cnβ=2na2nβ with 2nβ₯2 is well defined; finitely many terms do not affect convergence).
Condensing with ln2n=nln2 gives Cnβ=2nβ
2nβ
nln21β=ln21ββ
n1β for nβ₯1, so the condensed series βnβ₯1βCnβ is ln21β times the harmonic series β divergent.
Hence βn=2ββnlnn1β diverges too.
But bnβ=n(lnn)21β also needs the decreasing verification: for xβ₯2, x(lnx)2 has derivative (lnx)2+2lnx=lnx(lnx+2)>0, so n(lnn)2 is increasing and its reciprocal bnβ is decreasing.
With the same reindexing (condense from nβ₯1), bnβ condenses to Cnβ=2nβ
2n(nln2)21β=(ln2)21ββ
n21β for nβ₯1.
Since (ln2)21ββ2.0814 is a constant, the condensed series is a constant multiple of the convergent βnβ₯1βn21β β indeed summing to (ln2)21ββ
6Ο2ββ2.0814β
1.6449β3.4237.
Hence βn=2ββn(lnn)21β converges.
Numerical check (first series, block n=2): B2β=βk=47βklnk1ββ0.4710, C2β=2ln21ββ0.7213, 21βC3β=6ln21ββ0.2404 β matching the caption's 0.2404β€0.4710β€0.7213. One extra power of ln is exactly the borderline between divergence and convergence.