Cauchy Condensation Test

Terms get grouped into blocks that double in size here. The grouped series and the original share their fate.

For a decreasing sequence, the terms inside one block all look alike. So each block sum is trapped between multiples of one representative term. Compressing each block into its representative leaves convergence unchanged. The test becomes far easier to run.

For example, pack 🍬 candies into boxes of 1, 2, 4, doubling each time. Judging each box by one representative candy does not change whether the total is finite.

2na2n+1β‰€βˆ‘k=2n2n+1βˆ’1ak≀2na2n2^n a_{2^{n+1}} \le \sum_{k=2^n}^{2^{n+1}-1} a_k \le 2^n a_{2^n}
βˆ‘nβ‰₯11npΒ convergesβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Šp>1\sum_{n\ge 1}\frac{1}{n^p}\ \text{converges} \iff p>1

Part of these learning paths

Examples & Exercises

Let anβ‰₯0a_n \ge 0 be decreasing. Prove that βˆ‘n=1∞an\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n converges if and only if βˆ‘n=0∞2na2n\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} 2^n a_{2^n} converges (the Cauchy condensation test).

2na2n+1β‰€βˆ‘k=2n2n+1βˆ’1ak≀2na2n,Cn:=2na2n2^n a_{2^{n+1}} \le \sum_{k=2^n}^{2^{n+1}-1} a_k \le 2^n a_{2^n}, \qquad C_n := 2^n a_{2^n}
Block n=2n=2 [4,8)[4, 8): 0.5=12C3≀B2β‰ˆ0.7595≀C2=10.5 = \frac{1}{2}C_3 \le B_2 \approx 0.7595 \le C_2 = 1 β€” the block sum sits between the condensed terms.
Show proof
  1. Block nn holds 2n2^n terms in [2n,2n+1)[2^n, 2^{n+1}).

    Since the sequence decreases, each term is at most a2na_{2^n} and at least a2n+1a_{2^{n+1}}.

    Hence the block sum Bn=βˆ‘k=2n2n+1βˆ’1akB_n = \sum_{k=2^n}^{2^{n+1}-1} a_k satisfies 12Cn+1=2na2n+1≀Bn≀2na2n=Cn\frac{1}{2}C_{n+1} = 2^n a_{2^{n+1}} \le B_n \le 2^n a_{2^n} = C_n (with Cn:=2na2nC_n := 2^n a_{2^n}).

  2. (⇐)(\Leftarrow) Summing Bj≀CjB_j \le C_j for j=0j = 0 to NN gives S2N+1βˆ’1=βˆ‘j=0NBjβ‰€βˆ‘j=0NCj=TNS_{2^{N+1}-1} = \sum_{j=0}^{N} B_j \le \sum_{j=0}^{N} C_j = T_N.

    If βˆ‘Cj\sum C_j converges, then TN≀T:=βˆ‘j=0∞Cj<∞T_N \le T := \sum_{j=0}^{\infty} C_j < \infty.

    Extend from binary partial sums to all partial sums: for arbitrary mm, choose NN with m≀2N+1βˆ’1m \le 2^{N+1} - 1; since akβ‰₯0a_k \ge 0, SmS_m is increasing, so Sm≀S2N+1βˆ’1≀TN≀TS_m \le S_{2^{N+1}-1} \le T_N \le T.

    Hence all partial sums of βˆ‘an\sum a_n are bounded and converge.

  3. (β‡’)(\Rightarrow) Conversely, summing Cj+1≀2BjC_{j+1} \le 2 B_j for j=0j = 0 to NN gives TN+1βˆ’C0=βˆ‘j=1N+1Cj≀2βˆ‘j=0NBj=2S2N+1βˆ’1T_{N+1} - C_0 = \sum_{j=1}^{N+1} C_j \le 2 \sum_{j=0}^{N} B_j = 2 S_{2^{N+1}-1}. If βˆ‘an\sum a_n converges, the right side is bounded, so the partial sums of βˆ‘Cj\sum C_j are bounded and converge.

  4. Numerical check (harmonic series an=1/na_n = 1/n, block n=2n = 2): B2=14+15+16+17β‰ˆ0.7595B_2 = \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{7} \approx 0.7595, C2=4β‹…14=1C_2 = 4 \cdot \frac{1}{4} = 1, 12C3=12β‹…8β‹…18=0.5\frac{1}{2}C_3 = \frac{1}{2} \cdot 8 \cdot \frac{1}{8} = 0.5 β€” matching the caption's sandwich 0.5≀0.7595≀10.5 \le 0.7595 \le 1.

Use the condensation test to show that the pp-series βˆ‘n=1∞1np\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^p} converges for p>1p > 1 and diverges for p≀1p \le 1.

2nβ‹…1(2n)p=2n(1βˆ’p)=(21βˆ’p)n(geometricΒ series)2^n \cdot \frac{1}{(2^n)^p} = 2^{n(1-p)} = (2^{1-p})^n \quad \text{(geometric series)}
p=2p = 2, block [4,8)[4, 8): 0.0625=12C3≀B2β‰ˆ0.1507≀C2=0.250.0625 = \frac{1}{2}C_3 \le B_2 \approx 0.1507 \le C_2 = 0.25 β€” the condensed terms are geometric with ratio 1/21/2.
Show proof
  1. For p>0p > 0, an=1npa_n = \frac{1}{n^p} is a decreasing sequence of positive numbers. The condensed terms are Cn=2nβ‹…1(2n)p=2nβ‹…2βˆ’np=2n(1βˆ’p)=(21βˆ’p)nC_n = 2^n \cdot \frac{1}{(2^n)^p} = 2^n \cdot 2^{-np} = 2^{n(1-p)} = (2^{1-p})^n, a geometric series with ratio r=21βˆ’pr = 2^{1-p}.

  2. A geometric series converges for r<1r < 1 and diverges for rβ‰₯1r \ge 1. And r=21βˆ’p<1r = 2^{1-p} < 1 is equivalent to 1βˆ’p<01 - p < 0, i.e. p>1p > 1 (for p=1p = 1, r=1r = 1 gives the harmonic series).

  3. By the condensation test, βˆ‘1np\sum \frac{1}{n^p} shares its fate with the condensed series, so it converges for p>1p > 1 and diverges for p≀1p \le 1 (for p≀0p \le 0 the terms do not even tend to 00).

  4. Numerical check (p=2p = 2, block n=2n = 2): B2=116+125+136+149β‰ˆ0.1507B_2 = \frac{1}{16} + \frac{1}{25} + \frac{1}{36} + \frac{1}{49} \approx 0.1507, C2=4β‹…116=0.25C_2 = 4 \cdot \frac{1}{16} = 0.25, 12C3=12β‹…8β‹…164=0.0625\frac{1}{2}C_3 = \frac{1}{2} \cdot 8 \cdot \frac{1}{64} = 0.0625 β€” matching the caption's 0.0625≀0.1507≀0.250.0625 \le 0.1507 \le 0.25, and the condensed terms are exactly 2βˆ’n2^{-n}.

Show that βˆ‘n=2∞1nln⁑n\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n \ln n} diverges while βˆ‘n=2∞1n(ln⁑n)2\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n (\ln n)^2} converges, using the condensation test.

2nβ‹…12nln⁑2n=1nln⁑2=1ln⁑2β‹…1n2^n \cdot \frac{1}{2^n \ln 2^n} = \frac{1}{n \ln 2} = \frac{1}{\ln 2}\cdot\frac{1}{n}
2nβ‹…12n(ln⁑2n)2=1(ln⁑2)2β‹…1n22^n \cdot \frac{1}{2^n (\ln 2^n)^2} = \frac{1}{(\ln 2)^2}\cdot\frac{1}{n^2}
Block [4,8)[4, 8): 0.2404=12C3≀B2β‰ˆ0.4710≀C2=12ln⁑2β‰ˆ0.72130.2404 = \frac{1}{2}C_3 \le B_2 \approx 0.4710 \le C_2 = \frac{1}{2\ln 2} \approx 0.7213 β€” the condensed series is a constant multiple of the harmonic series, hence divergent.
Show proof
  1. First verify the decreasing hypothesis: for xβ‰₯2x \ge 2, xln⁑xx \ln x has derivative ln⁑x+1>0\ln x + 1 > 0, so xln⁑xx \ln x is increasing and its reciprocal an=1nln⁑na_n = \frac{1}{n \ln n} is decreasing and positive for nβ‰₯2n \ge 2.

    Reindexing is also needed: the condensation in problem 1 starts at n=1n = 1 and includes a C0C_0 term, but this series starts at n=2n = 2 and C0=10β‹…ln⁑2C_0 = \frac{1}{0 \cdot \ln 2} is singular.

    So start the condensed sum at nβ‰₯1n \ge 1 (Cn=2na2nC_n = 2^n a_{2^n} with 2nβ‰₯22^n \ge 2 is well defined; finitely many terms do not affect convergence).

    Condensing with ln⁑2n=nln⁑2\ln 2^n = n \ln 2 gives Cn=2nβ‹…12nβ‹…nln⁑2=1ln⁑2β‹…1nC_n = 2^n \cdot \frac{1}{2^n \cdot n \ln 2} = \frac{1}{\ln 2}\cdot\frac{1}{n} for nβ‰₯1n \ge 1, so the condensed series βˆ‘nβ‰₯1Cn\sum_{n \ge 1} C_n is 1ln⁑2\frac{1}{\ln 2} times the harmonic series β€” divergent.

    Hence βˆ‘n=2∞1nln⁑n\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n \ln n} diverges too.

  2. But bn=1n(ln⁑n)2b_n = \frac{1}{n (\ln n)^2} also needs the decreasing verification: for xβ‰₯2x \ge 2, x(ln⁑x)2x (\ln x)^2 has derivative (ln⁑x)2+2ln⁑x=ln⁑x(ln⁑x+2)>0(\ln x)^2 + 2\ln x = \ln x (\ln x + 2) > 0, so n(ln⁑n)2n (\ln n)^2 is increasing and its reciprocal bnb_n is decreasing.

    With the same reindexing (condense from nβ‰₯1n \ge 1), bnb_n condenses to Cn=2nβ‹…12n(nln⁑2)2=1(ln⁑2)2β‹…1n2C_n = 2^n \cdot \frac{1}{2^n (n \ln 2)^2} = \frac{1}{(\ln 2)^2}\cdot\frac{1}{n^2} for nβ‰₯1n \ge 1.

    Since 1(ln⁑2)2β‰ˆ2.0814\frac{1}{(\ln 2)^2} \approx 2.0814 is a constant, the condensed series is a constant multiple of the convergent βˆ‘nβ‰₯11n2\sum_{n \ge 1} \frac{1}{n^2} β€” indeed summing to 1(ln⁑2)2β‹…Ο€26β‰ˆ2.0814β‹…1.6449β‰ˆ3.4237\frac{1}{(\ln 2)^2}\cdot\frac{\pi^2}{6} \approx 2.0814 \cdot 1.6449 \approx 3.4237.

    Hence βˆ‘n=2∞1n(ln⁑n)2\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n (\ln n)^2} converges.

  3. Numerical check (first series, block n=2n = 2): B2=βˆ‘k=471kln⁑kβ‰ˆ0.4710B_2 = \sum_{k=4}^{7} \frac{1}{k \ln k} \approx 0.4710, C2=12ln⁑2β‰ˆ0.7213C_2 = \frac{1}{2\ln 2} \approx 0.7213, 12C3=16ln⁑2β‰ˆ0.2404\frac{1}{2}C_3 = \frac{1}{6\ln 2} \approx 0.2404 β€” matching the caption's 0.2404≀0.4710≀0.72130.2404 \le 0.4710 \le 0.7213. One extra power of ln⁑\ln is exactly the borderline between divergence and convergence.

7. Series