A sequence built only from rationals creeps toward a place that is not rational. The scene shows the hole in the rational world.
The iteration halves the error of each guess. Every term stays rational. Yet the destination is not a rational number. So rationals alone cannot fill that spot. The full irrationality proof is skipped; only the idea is shown.
For example, measure the diagonal of a square with a π ruler. Try 1.4, then 1.41, then 1.414 β no fraction ever fits it exactly. That spot is the hole in the rationals.
With x0β=1 and xn+1β=2xnβ+2/xnββ, write x5β as an exact fraction and prove β£x5ββ2ββ£<10β24.
x5β=627013566048886731088897β
β£x5ββ2ββ£<10β24
n=5 β five iterations get 24 decimal places right.Show proof
Computing in fractions gives x1β=23β, x2β=1217β, x3β=408577β, x4β=470832665857β, x5β=627013566048886731088897β, by applying qpββ¦2pqp2+2q2β at each step.
Moreover pn+12ββ2qn+12β=(pn2β+2qn2β)2β8pn2βqn2β=(pn2ββ2qn2β)2, and p12ββ2q12β=9β8=1, so pn2ββ2qn2β=1 for all nβ₯1. Hence gcd(pnβ,qnβ)=1 β every fraction is in lowest terms.
Put enβ=xn2ββ2.
Expanding gives en+1β=4xn2βen2ββ.
Since x1β=23β>2β and xn+1ββ2β=2xnβ(xnββ2β)2ββ₯0, we have xnββ₯2β for all nβ₯1, hence en+1ββ€8en2ββ.
We get e1β=41β, e2β=1441β, e3β=1664641β, e4β=2216827722241β<4.6Γ10β12. Hence e5ββ€8e42ββ<2.7Γ10β24, and β£x5ββ2ββ£=x5β+2βe5ββ<2.82.7Γ10β24β<10β24.
Show that every term of bnβ=(1+n1β)n is rational, and explain why its irrational limit e is another "hole" in Q.
bnβ=(nn+1β)nβQ,nββlimβbnβ=eβ/Q
Babylonian iterates at n=5 β the same phenomenon: rational terms homing in on an irrational limit.Show proof
bnβ=(nn+1β)n with nn+1β rational. A rational number raised to a positive integer power is rational, so bnββQ for every n.
The sequence (bnβ) is increasing and bounded above (taken as known β it is standard), hence convergent. Its limit is called e.
Identification of the two e's first.
Write S=βk=0ββk!1β and expand bnβ by the binomial theorem as in the eseries scene (compound problem): bnβ=βk=0nβan,kβ with an,kβ=k!1ββj=0kβ1β(1βnjβ)β€k!1β.
Fix Kβ€n: then bnββ₯βk=0Kβan,kβ, and an,kββk!1β as nββ for each fixed k, so liminfbnββ₯βk=0Kβk!1β.
Also bnββ€βk=0nβk!1ββ€S, so limsupbnββ€S.
Letting Kββ forces limbnβ=S: the e defined here as limbnβ is the series number S.
With the two definitions identified, that eβ/Q is an established theorem (proved, for instance, by estimating the remainder of e=βk=0ββk!1β).
So the rational sequence (bnβ) converges to no rational number β another hole in Q, distinct from the one at 2β.
Prove that the Babylonian sequence (xnβ) is Cauchy but has no limit in Q β this is what completeness is about.
n=8 β the terms get arbitrarily close to each other, yet no rational number is their destination.Show proof
From the error analysis, en+1ββ€8en2ββ with e1β=41β.
Since enββ€2βn by induction (true at n=1, and en+1ββ€82β2nβ=2β(2n+3)β€2β(n+1)), we get enββ0.
With β£xnββ2ββ£=xnβ+2βenβββ€2enββ, we have xnββ2β as real numbers.
Let Ξ΅>0.
Since xnββ2β, choose N with β£xnββ2ββ£<Ξ΅/2 for all nβ₯N.
Then for all m,nβ₯N, β£xmββxnββ£β€β£xmββ2ββ£+β£xnββ2ββ£<Ξ΅/2+Ξ΅/2=Ξ΅.
Hence (xnβ) is a Cauchy sequence.
If xnββr for some rational r, uniqueness of limits forces r=2β.
But 2ββ/Q β a contradiction.
So (xnβ) has no limit inside Q.
For reference, the classical proof that 2ββ/Q: if 2β=qpβ in lowest terms, then p2=2q2, so p is even; writing p=2k gives q2=2k2, so q is even too β contradicting lowest terms.