What if we dig out less? Removing only length 4−n per interval leaves a set that is compact, nowhere dense and perfect — yet keeps total length 21. Measure and topological size are independent notions.
Consider the fat Cantor set: at stage n, from each of the 2n−1 surviving closed intervals remove the middle open interval of absolute length 4−n. Prove the total removed length over all stages is 21 via a geometric series, and check that the length remaining after N stages is 21+2−N.
n=1∑∞2n−1⋅4−n=n=1∑∞2−n−1=1−1/21/4=21
1−n=1∑N2−n−1=1−21(1−2−N)=21(1+2−N)N→∞21
Stage n=4: 16 intervals, remaining length 3217=0.53125→21 — the standard Cantor set has 16 intervals with (32)4=8116≈0.197531→0.Show proof
At stage n there are 2n−1 surviving closed intervals from stage n−1, and exactly one middle open interval of length 4−n is removed from each. Removed open intervals from different stages and different parent intervals are all pairwise disjoint (each is carved out of the interior of a closed interval, and the surviving sets are nested). So the total length removed through stage N is the sum of the per-stage contributions.
The stage-n contribution is 2n−1⋅4−n. Simplifying the exponent, 4n2n−1=22n2n−1=2−n−1, so the total removed length is the geometric series ∑n=1∞2−n−1 with ratio 21. Its first term is 41, giving 1−1/21/4=21.
The finite-stage version: through stage N the total removed is the partial sum ∑n=1N2−n−1=41⋅1−1/21−2−N=21(1−2−N). Starting from [0,1], the length remaining after N stages is 1−21(1−2−N)=21(1+2−N), tending to 21 as N→∞. For N=1 this is 1−41=43=21(1+21) — the surviving intervals [0,83] and [85,1] with the middle (83,85) carved out, exactly as the scene shows.
Hence the pairwise-disjoint union G of the removed open intervals has Lebesgue measure m(G)=21, and since C=[0,1]∖G, we get m(C)=1−21=21>0. This is where the fat Cantor set parts company with the standard Cantor set (middle third removed each stage, remaining length (2/3)n→0).
Let the fat Cantor set be C=⋂n≥0Fn, where F0=[0,1] and Fn removes the middle open interval (length 4−n) from each closed interval of Fn−1. Prove C is compact, nowhere dense, and perfect (noting that its interior is empty yet m(C)=21).
ℓn=2ℓn−1−4−n<2−n
C=n≥0⋂Fnclosed⊂[0,1]compact
int(C)=∅(every open interval meets a removed piece)
x∈C⇒x=limzn,zn∈C∖{x}
Stage n=4: 16 intervals with remaining length 0.53125 — sixteen thin slivers, yet topologically the set is "hollow inside" (proof below: every open interval meets a removed piece).Show proof
Compact: each Fn is a finite union of closed intervals, hence closed, and C=⋂nFn is an intersection of closed sets, hence closed. Since C⊂[0,1] is bounded, Heine–Borel makes C compact.
Length lemma: by symmetry every stage-n interval has the same length. Calling it ℓn, we have ℓ0=1 and ℓn=(ℓn−1−4−n)/2, so ℓn<ℓn−1/2. By induction ℓn<2−n, and in particular ℓn→0.
Nowhere dense: since C is closed, it suffices to show its closure — itself — has empty interior. Take a nonempty open interval I of length δ>0, shrinking it into (0,1) if needed (otherwise I⊂C trivially). Choose n with 2−n<δ, so ℓn<δ. Suppose I meets no removed open interval; then I⊂Fn. But Fn is a union of pairwise-disjoint closed intervals and I is connected, so I lies entirely inside exactly one of them, say J. Then δ=∣I∣≤∣J∣=ℓn<δ — contradiction.
Hence I always meets a removed open interval, and the intersection is a nonempty open subset of I∖C. No nonempty open interval sits inside C, so int(C)=∅ — C is nowhere dense.
Perfect: let x∈C. At each stage n, x lies in some stage-n interval Jn. At stage n+1, Jn splits into two closed children J′,J′′ separated by the removed open middle, and x belongs to one of them, say J′. Choosing a nested chain of children, the nested-interval principle gives C∩J′′=∅, so pick zn∈C∩J′′. The middle gap separates x from zn, so zn=x, and ∣zn−x∣≤ℓn<2−n→0. Thus x is a limit point of C. This holds for every x∈C, so C is perfect.
Let U=[0,1]∖C be the complement of the fat Cantor set. Prove U is (relatively) open, dense in [0,1], and has m(U)=21. Then finish by completing this table: "empty interior, yet half the length" — measure and topological size are independent notions.
U=stages⋃(removed open intervals)
m(U)=21,m(C)=21
nowhere densedensem=0standard CantorQ∩[0,1]m>0fat Cantorirrationals in [0,1]
Stage n=4: the removed open intervals total 21(1−2−4)=0.46875 in length, leaving 0.53125 — the complement is already nearly half, and in the limit exactly 21.Show proof
U is the complement of the closed set C, hence relatively open in [0,1]. Concretely, U is the union of the removed open intervals over all stages — a countable union of pairwise-disjoint open intervals.
Dense: the previous problem showed that every nonempty open interval meets a removed open interval. Hence every open interval contains a point of U, so U is dense in [0,1].
Measure: the removed open intervals are pairwise disjoint, so m(U)=∑n=1∞2n−14−n=21 (the geometric series from the first problem). Hence m(C)=m([0,1])−m(U)=1−21=21.
To summarize: C is closed, has empty interior (nowhere dense), is perfect, and has length 21; its complement U is open, dense, and has length 21. The table above fills all four cells — the standard Cantor set (nowhere dense, measure 0), the fat Cantor set (nowhere dense, measure 21), the rationals in [0,1] (dense, measure 0), the irrationals (dense, measure 1). There are even sets that are open and dense with arbitrarily small measure (around each rational qk take an open interval of radius ε/2k: total measure ≤2ε). The punchline: the topological statement "has empty interior" and the measure-theoretic statement "has such-and-such length" impose nothing on each other — and the fat Cantor set is the most dramatic witness to their independence.