Proof by Contrapositive

The n=1..12n = 1..12 grid where the n2n^2-even rows are exactly the nn-even rows — where the direct proof of "n2n^2 even ⇒\Rightarrow nn even" stalls, the contrapositive "odd nn ⇒\Rightarrow odd n2n^2" opens up through (2k+1)2=2(2k2+2k)+1(2k+1)^2 = 2(2k^2+2k)+1.

n2 even⇒n even  ⟺  n odd⇒n2 oddn^2 \text{ even} \Rightarrow n \text{ even} \iff n \text{ odd} \Rightarrow n^2 \text{ odd}
(2k+1)2=2(2k2+2k)+1(2k+1)^2 = 2(2k^2+2k)+1

Examples & Exercises

Prove completely, by contrapositive, that for an integer nn, "if n2n^2 is even then nn is even". Reduce the claim to its contrapositive, "if nn is odd then n2n^2 is odd", and prove that by the odd-square expansion.

n2 even⇒n even⟺n odd⇒n2 oddn^2 \text{ even} \Rightarrow n \text{ even} \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad n \text{ odd} \Rightarrow n^2 \text{ odd}
n=7n = 7 (odd): n=2⋅3+1n = 2 \cdot 3 + 1, n2=49=2⋅24+1n^2 = 49 = 2 \cdot 24 + 1 — odd. The contrapositive computation is on display.
Show proof
  1. The claim is P⇒QP \Rightarrow Q with PP: "n2n^2 is even" and QQ: "nn is even". An implication is logically equivalent to its contrapositive (both fail exactly when PP is true and QQ false), so we prove ¬Q⇒¬P\lnot Q \Rightarrow \lnot P: "if nn is odd then n2n^2 is odd".
  2. The contrapositive is proved directly: if nn is odd, then n=2k+1n = 2k + 1 for some integer kk, and n2=(2k+1)2=4k2+4k+1=2(2k2+2k)+1n^2 = (2k+1)^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1 = 2(2k^2 + 2k) + 1. Since 2k2+2k2k^2 + 2k is an integer, n2n^2 is odd. Check in the scene: n=7n = 7 gives k=3k = 3 and n2=49=2⋅(2⋅9+6)+1=2⋅24+1n^2 = 49 = 2 \cdot (2 \cdot 9 + 6) + 1 = 2 \cdot 24 + 1. The contrapositive is proved, so by equivalence the original claim "if n2n^2 is even then nn is even" is proved. (Why the direct attempt stalls: the assumption n2=2mn^2 = 2m gives no handle for computing with nn — the contrapositive swaps it for the workable form n=2k+1n = 2k + 1.)
    (2k+1)2=4k2+4k+1=2(2k2+2k)+1(2k+1)^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1 = 2(2k^2 + 2k) + 1

Prove by contrapositive that for an integer nn, "if 3n+23n + 2 is odd then nn is odd". First explain why the direct route is awkward: "3n+23n + 2 odd" only yields "3n3n odd", with no direct grip on nn itself.

3n+2 odd⇒n odd⟺n even⇒3n+2 even3n + 2 \text{ odd} \Rightarrow n \text{ odd} \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad n \text{ even} \Rightarrow 3n + 2 \text{ even}
n=8n = 8 (even): n=2⋅4n = 2 \cdot 4, 3n+2=26=2(3⋅4+1)=2⋅133n + 2 = 26 = 2(3 \cdot 4 + 1) = 2 \cdot 13 — even. The contrapositive direction is on display.
Show proof
  1. Why the direct route is awkward: assuming 3n+23n + 2 is odd gives 3n=(3n+2)−23n = (3n + 2) - 2, so 3n3n is odd. But passing from "3 times nn is odd" to "nn is odd" needs a separate argument that nn cannot be even — there is no computable form of nn to work with. So we turn to the contrapositive: "if nn is even then 3n+23n + 2 is even".
  2. Prove the contrapositive directly: if nn is even, write n=2kn = 2k with kk an integer; then 3n+2=3(2k)+2=6k+2=2(3k+1)3n + 2 = 3(2k) + 2 = 6k + 2 = 2(3k + 1). Since 3k+13k + 1 is an integer, 3n+23n + 2 is even. The contrapositive is proved, so by equivalence the original claim "if 3n+23n + 2 is odd then nn is odd" is proved. Check in the scene: n=8=2⋅4n = 8 = 2 \cdot 4 gives 3n+2=26=2(3⋅4+1)=2⋅133n + 2 = 26 = 2(3 \cdot 4 + 1) = 2 \cdot 13, even.

Prove that for an integer nn, "if n2n^2 is divisible by 3 then nn is divisible by 3". Take the contrapositive, then split the case "3 does not divide nn" into n=3k+1n = 3k + 1 and n=3k+2n = 3k + 2, showing in each case that 3 does not divide n2n^2.

n=3k+1⇒n2=3(3k2+2k)+1,n=3k+2⇒n2=3(3k2+4k+1)+1n = 3k+1 \Rightarrow n^2 = 3(3k^2 + 2k) + 1, \qquad n = 3k+2 \Rightarrow n^2 = 3(3k^2 + 4k + 1) + 1
n=9n = 9: n2=81=3⋅27n^2 = 81 = 3 \cdot 27 — divisible by 3, and n=9=3⋅3n = 9 = 3 \cdot 3 is too. A check in the statement's own form.
Show proof
  1. We prove the contrapositive: "if 3 does not divide nn then 3 does not divide n2n^2". By the division algorithm, if 3 does not divide nn the remainder is 1 or 2, so n=3k+1n = 3k + 1 or n=3k+2n = 3k + 2 for some integer kk. Compute each case.
  2. Case 1: if n=3k+1n = 3k + 1 then n2=9k2+6k+1=3(3k2+2k)+1n^2 = 9k^2 + 6k + 1 = 3(3k^2 + 2k) + 1 — remainder 1 on division by 3, so 3 does not divide n2n^2. Case 2: if n=3k+2n = 3k + 2 then n2=9k2+12k+4=3(3k2+4k+1)+1n^2 = 9k^2 + 12k + 4 = 3(3k^2 + 4k + 1) + 1 — again remainder 1, so 3 does not divide n2n^2. Both cases give the contrapositive's conclusion, so the contrapositive is proved, and by equivalence so is the original claim. Check in the scene: n=9=3⋅3n = 9 = 3 \cdot 3 is divisible by 3 and n2=81=3⋅27n^2 = 81 = 3 \cdot 27 is too.

1. Foundations of Proof