Existence of n-th Roots

The supremum of {x≥0:xn<a}\{x \ge 0 : x^n < a\} IS an\sqrt[n]{a} — watch the supremum axiom fill a "gap" and manufacture a root.

s=sup⁡{x≥0:xn<a}⇒sn=as = \sup\{x \ge 0 : x^n < a\} \Rightarrow s^n = a
an exists and is unique\sqrt[n]{a}\ \text{exists and is unique}

Examples & Exercises

For a>0a > 0 and a natural number nn, let E={x≥0:xn<a}E = \{x \ge 0 : x^n < a\}. Show EE is nonempty and bounded above, and with s=sup⁡Es = \sup E prove completely by trichotomy that sn=as^n = a.

E={x≥0:xn<a},s=sup⁡E,sn=aE = \{x \ge 0 : x^n < a\}, \qquad s = \sup E, \qquad s^n = a
a=2a = 2, n=2n = 2: the shaded region is E={x≥0:x2<2}E = \{x \ge 0 : x^2 < 2\}, and its supremum s=sup⁡Es = \sup E sits at the vertical dashed line, 2≈1.41421356\sqrt{2} \approx 1.41421356. The proof below shows this ss is exactly the square root of aa.
Show proof
  1. EE is nonempty: 0n=0<a0^n = 0 < a, so 0∈E0 \in E. And a+1a + 1 is an upper bound of EE: if x>a+1x > a + 1 then, since a>0a > 0, x>1x > 1, hence xn≥x>a+1>ax^n \ge x > a + 1 > a, so x∉Ex \notin E.
  2. By completeness of the reals (the least-upper-bound axiom), s=sup⁡Es = \sup E exists. We have s≥0s \ge 0; we show sn=as^n = a by trichotomy: ruling out sn<as^n < a and sn>as^n > a leaves sn=as^n = a.
  3. Suppose sn<as^n < a. For δ>0\delta > 0, the binomial theorem gives (s+δ)n−sn=∑k=1n(nk)sn−kδk=δ∑k=1n(nk)sn−kδk−1(s+\delta)^n - s^n = \sum_{k=1}^{n}\binom{n}{k}s^{n-k}\delta^k = \delta\sum_{k=1}^{n}\binom{n}{k}s^{n-k}\delta^{k-1}. For 0<δ<10 < \delta < 1, δk−1≤1\delta^{k-1} \le 1, so this difference is at most δM\delta M, where M=∑k=1n(nk)(s+1)n−kM = \sum_{k=1}^{n}\binom{n}{k}(s+1)^{n-k} depends only on ss. Picking 0<δ<min⁡(1,(a−sn)/M)0 < \delta < \min(1, (a - s^n)/M) gives (s+δ)n<sn+(a−sn)=a(s+\delta)^n < s^n + (a - s^n) = a, and s+δ≥0s + \delta \ge 0, so s+δ∈Es + \delta \in E — contradicting ss being an upper bound.
  4. Suppose sn>as^n > a. Since a≥0a \ge 0, s>0s > 0. For 0<δ<s0 < \delta < s, put t=s−δt = s - \delta; the factorization sn−tn=(s−t)(sn−1+sn−2t+⋯+tn−1)s^n - t^n = (s-t)(s^{n-1} + s^{n-2}t + \cdots + t^{n-1}) gives sn−(s−δ)n=δ∑j=0n−1sn−1−jtj≤n δ sn−1s^n - (s-\delta)^n = \delta\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}s^{n-1-j}t^j \le n\,\delta\,s^{n-1} (each term is at most sn−1s^{n-1} since t≤st \le s). Picking 0<δ<min⁡(s,(sn−a)/(nsn−1))0 < \delta < \min(s, (s^n - a)/(n s^{n-1})) yields (s−δ)n>a(s-\delta)^n > a. But every x≥s−δx \ge s - \delta satisfies xn≥(s−δ)n>ax^n \ge (s-\delta)^n > a, so x∉Ex \notin E — i.e. s−δs - \delta is also an upper bound of EE, contradicting ss being the least upper bound.
  5. Hence sn=as^n = a, and since s≥0s \ge 0, ss is the nonnegative nn-th root of aa. (Uniqueness is the next problem.) This proof grabs the continuity of xnx^n by hand through the binomial expansion — an argument that works precisely because the least-upper-bound axiom guarantees a "hole-free" real line.

Prove that if s,t≥0s, t \ge 0 and sn=tn=as^n = t^n = a, then s=ts = t — the nonnegative nn-th root is unique.

tn−sn=(t−s)(tn−1+tn−2s+⋯+sn−1)t^n - s^n = (t-s)(t^{n-1} + t^{n-2}s + \cdots + s^{n-1})
a=2a = 2, n=2n = 2: the vertical dashed line is drawn at a single point, 2≈1.41421356\sqrt{2} \approx 1.41421356 — there is exactly one nonnegative number squaring to 22.
Show proof
  1. Suppose 0≤s<t0 \le s < t. In the factorization tn−sn=(t−s)(tn−1+tn−2s+⋯+sn−1)t^n - s^n = (t-s)(t^{n-1} + t^{n-2}s + \cdots + s^{n-1}), the first factor t−s>0t - s > 0, and each term of the second factor is nonnegative and not all zero (in particular tn−1>0t^{n-1} > 0, since t>0t > 0). Hence tn−sn>0t^n - s^n > 0, i.e. sn<tns^n < t^n: xnx^n is strictly increasing on [0,∞)[0, \infty).
  2. If sn=tn=as^n = t^n = a with s≠ts \ne t, then by symmetry s<ts < t or t<st < s, and the above gives sn≠tns^n \ne t^n — a contradiction. Hence s=ts = t: the nonnegative nn-th root is unique.

When approximating the nn-th root of aa by bisection, prove the error bound ∣xk−s∣≤b0−a02k|x_k - s| \le \frac{b_0 - a_0}{2^k} for the kk-th midpoint xkx_k, and verify it numerically by computing 10 steps for a=2a = 2, n=2n = 2.

∣xk−s∣≤b0−a02k,x10=1.416015625\lvert x_k - s\rvert \le \frac{b_0 - a_0}{2^k}, \qquad x_{10} = 1.416015625
∣x10−2∣≈0.0018021<2210=0.001953125\lvert x_{10} - \sqrt{2}\rvert \approx 0.0018021 < \frac{2}{2^{10}} = 0.001953125
a=2a = 2, n=2n = 2: 60 bisection iterations give 2≈1.41421356\sqrt{2} \approx 1.41421356 (∣diff∣≈2.2×10−16|\text{diff}| \approx 2.2\times 10^{-16}). Below, the error bound is checked directly at 10 steps.
Show proof
  1. Start from [a0,b0]=[0,max⁡(1,a)][a_0, b_0] = [0, \max(1, a)]: a0n−a=−a<0≤b0n−aa_0^n - a = -a < 0 \le b_0^n - a, so the (unique) root ss lies inside. At each step, at the midpoint mm, if mn<am^n < a discard the left half (s>ms > m), else discard the right (s≤ms \le m) — the sign brackets ss, so the invariant s∈[ak,bk]s \in [a_k, b_k] is preserved and the length halves each time: bk−ak=b0−a02kb_k - a_k = \frac{b_0 - a_0}{2^k}.
  2. Since xk=ak+bk2x_k = \frac{a_k + b_k}{2} is the midpoint and ss lies in the same interval, ∣xk−s∣≤bk−ak2=b0−a02k+1≤b0−a02k|x_k - s| \le \frac{b_k - a_k}{2} = \frac{b_0 - a_0}{2^{k+1}} \le \frac{b_0 - a_0}{2^k}. (Counting steps from 1 gives exactly b0−a02k\frac{b_0-a_0}{2^k}.) The error at least halves every step.
  3. For a=2a = 2, n=2n = 2, [a0,b0]=[0,2][a_0, b_0] = [0, 2], so the bound is 22k\frac{2}{2^k}. Running 10 steps by hand gives x10=1.416015625x_{10} = 1.416015625 and ∣x10−2∣≈0.0018021|x_{10} - \sqrt{2}| \approx 0.0018021 — inside the bound 2210=1512≈0.0019531\frac{2}{2^{10}} = \frac{1}{512} \approx 0.0019531. The model's 60-iteration value 1.4142135623730951.414213562373095 agrees with 2\sqrt{2} to within 2.3×10−162.3\times 10^{-16}.

1. Number Systems