The area under \t^{p-1}(1-t)^{q-1}\ is the beta function — morph its shape with the \p\, \q\ sliders. Also covers \B(p,q) = \\Gamma(p)\\Gamma(q)/\\Gamma(p+q)\, the bridge to the gamma function.
Prove that the improper integral B(p,q)=∫01tp−1(1−t)q−1dt converges for p,q>0.
∫01/2tp−1(1−t)q−1dt≍∫01/2tp−1dt<∞⟺p>0
p=0.5 — blows up at t=0, yet the integral converges.Show proof
Split the integral at t=1/2. On (0,1/2] we have 21≤1−t<1, so (1−t)q−1 is trapped between the positive constants c1=min(1,21−q) and c2=max(1,21−q). Hence c1tp−1≤tp−1(1−t)q−1≤c2tp−1, and the comparison test reduces the convergence of ∫01/2tp−1(1−t)q−1dt to that of ∫01/2tp−1dt.
∫δ1/2tp−1dt=p(1/2)p−δp for p=0, which converges to p2−p as δ→0+ when p>0. For p=0 it is −ln(2δ)→∞, and for p<0 it is ∣p∣δp→∞. So ∫01/2tp−1dt converges exactly when p>0.
The end t=1 is symmetric. With s=1−t, ∫1/21−εtp−1(1−t)q−1dt=∫ε1/2(1−s)p−1sq−1ds (a legitimate C1 substitution on a compact interval), so the same argument with p and q swapped shows ∫1/21tp−1(1−t)q−1dt converges exactly when q>0.
On the middle piece [δ,1−δ] the integrand is continuous, so the integral is always finite. Hence the improper integral B(p,q) converges exactly when p>0 and q>0 — the divergences at the two ends cannot cancel, since the integrand is positive.
Problem 1 gives convergence for p,q>0, so we may substitute u=1−t (du=−dt) in the truncated integral ∫δ1−εtp−1(1−t)q−1dt (a C1 substitution on a compact interval).
The interval flips: t=δ gives u=1−δ and t=1−ε gives u=ε, so ∫δ1−εtp−1(1−t)q−1dt=∫1−δε(1−u)p−1uq−1(−du)=∫ε1−δuq−1(1−u)p−1du.
Sending δ,ε→0+, convergence from problem 1 turns the two sides into B(p,q) and B(q,p), so B(p,q)=B(q,p). Flipping the curve tp−1(1−t)q−1 left-right leaves the area underneath unchanged.
Show B(p+1,q)=qpB(p,q+1) by parts, then deduce B(p+1,q)=p+qpB(p,q).
B(p+1,q)=p+qpB(p,q)
p=1,q=3 — B(2,3)=41B(1,3)=121.Show proof
Apply parts to B(p+1,q)=∫01tp(1−t)q−1dt with u=tp, dv=(1−t)q−1dt. Then du=ptp−1dt and v=−q(1−t)q.
The boundary term [−qtp(1−t)q]01 vanishes: at t=1, (1−t)q→0 since q>0; at t=0, tp→0 since p>0. Hence B(p+1,q)=qp∫01tp−1(1−t)qdt=qpB(p,q+1).
Meanwhile, multiplying the integrand of B(p,q)=∫01tp−1(1−t)q−1dt by 1=t+(1−t) gives ∫01tp(1−t)q−1dt+∫01tp−1(1−t)qdt, that is, B(p+1,q)+B(p,q+1).
From the second step, B(p,q+1)=pqB(p+1,q); substituting gives B(p,q)=B(p+1,q)+pqB(p+1,q)=pp+qB(p+1,q). Rearranging yields B(p+1,q)=p+qpB(p,q).
A note (an idea-level sketch, not a proof): the bridge to the gamma function, B(p,q)=Γ(p+q)Γ(p)Γ(q), follows the standard sketch — write Γ(p)Γ(q) as a double integral over (0,∞)2; the polar substitution t=r2sin2θ, s=r2cos2θ then separates the radial part into Γ(p+q) and the angular part into B(p,q). The full justification, including Fubini's theorem on the unbounded domain, goes beyond this scene, so we take the relation as the bridge, not as a proved theorem here.