← 8. Series of Functions & Fourier

Exercises

Problems to check your understanding of this chapter. The solutions are folded away — try them yourself first.

Medium

1Medium

Show that ∑n=1∞1n2+x2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2+x^2} converges uniformly on all of R\mathbb{R} by the M-test, and prove its sum is continuous on R\mathbb{R}.

∣1n2+x2∣≤1n2=:Mn,∑n=1∞Mn<∞\left|\frac{1}{n^2+x^2}\right| \le \frac{1}{n^2} =: M_n, \qquad \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} M_n < \infty
Show solution
  1. For every real xx, n2+x2≥n2n^2+x^2 \ge n^2, so ∣1n2+x2∣≤1n2=:Mn\left|\frac{1}{n^2+x^2}\right| \le \frac{1}{n^2} =: M_n. Since ∑Mn=∑1n2\sum M_n = \sum \frac{1}{n^2} converges (a pp-series with p=2p = 2), the Weierstrass M-test gives uniform convergence of ∑n=1∞1n2+x2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2+x^2} on R\mathbb{R}.
  2. Each term fn(x)=1n2+x2f_n(x) = \frac{1}{n^2+x^2} is continuous on R\mathbb{R} (the denominator never vanishes). A uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous, so the sum S(x)=∑n=1∞1n2+x2S(x) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2+x^2} is continuous on all of R\mathbb{R}.

Hard

2Hard

Let sN(x)=∑n=1N(1−x)xns_N(x) = \sum_{n=1}^{N}(1-x)x^n for N≥1N \ge 1. (a) Show sNs_N converges uniformly on [0,a][0,a] (0<a<10 < a < 1) via Dini's theorem. (b) Prove it does not converge uniformly on [0,1][0,1].

sN(x)=x(1−xN)↑x(0≤x<1),sN(1)=0s_N(x) = x(1-x^N) \uparrow x \quad (0 \le x < 1), \qquad s_N(1) = 0
Show solution
  1. For x≠1x \ne 1, ∑n=1Nxn=x(1−xN)1−x\sum_{n=1}^{N}x^n = \frac{x(1-x^N)}{1-x}, so sN(x)=x(1−xN)s_N(x) = x(1-x^N) (the same formula holds at x=1x = 1, where every term is 00). Each sNs_N is a polynomial, hence continuous, and sN+1(x)−sN(x)=(1−x)xN+1≥0s_{N+1}(x)-s_N(x) = (1-x)x^{N+1} \ge 0 (0≤x≤10 \le x \le 1), so sNs_N is monotone increasing.
  2. (a) For 0≤x≤a<10 \le x \le a < 1, xN→0x^N \to 0, so sN(x)→xs_N(x) \to x. The limit s(x)=xs(x) = x is continuous on [0,a][0,a]; a monotone increasing sequence of continuous functions converging pointwise to a continuous limit converges uniformly by Dini's theorem.
  3. (b) The pointwise limit on [0,1][0,1] is s(x)=xs(x) = x (x<1x < 1), s(1)=0s(1) = 0, which is discontinuous at x=1x = 1 (lim⁡x→1−s(x)=1≠0=s(1)\lim_{x\to 1^{-}}s(x) = 1 \ne 0 = s(1)). A uniform limit of continuous functions must be continuous, so convergence on [0,1][0,1] cannot be uniform.
3Hard

Let Kn≥0K_n \ge 0 be continuous 2π2\pi-periodic kernels satisfying: (i) 12π∫−ππKn(t) dt=1\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} K_n(t)\,dt = 1; (ii) mass concentration: for every δ>0\delta > 0, 12π∫δ≤∣t∣≤πKn(t) dt→0\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\int_{\delta \le \lvert t \rvert \le \pi} K_n(t)\,dt \to 0 as n→∞n \to \infty. For ff continuous and 2π2\pi-periodic, prove the convolution (f∗Kn)(x)=12π∫−ππf(x−t)Kn(t) dt(f \ast K_n)(x) = \dfrac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x-t)K_n(t)\,dt converges to ff uniformly. (The Fejér kernel satisfies these hypotheses — see the Fejér scene — so this generalizes Fejér's theorem.)

∣(f∗Kn)(x)−f(x)∣≤12π∫−ππKn(t) ∣f(x−t)−f(x)∣ dt\lvert (f \ast K_n)(x) - f(x) \rvert \le \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} K_n(t)\,\lvert f(x-t) - f(x) \rvert\,dt
=12π∫∣t∣<δ⋯⏟uniform continuity+12π∫δ≤∣t∣≤π⋯⏟tail →0= \underbrace{\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{\lvert t \rvert < \delta} \cdots}_{\text{uniform continuity}} + \underbrace{\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{\delta \le \lvert t \rvert \le \pi} \cdots}_{\text{tail } \to 0}
Show solution
  1. Since the mass is 11, write f(x)=12π∫−ππf(x)Kn(t) dtf(x) = \dfrac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x)K_n(t)\,dt (f(x−t)f(x-t) is well defined for t∈[−π,π]t \in [-\pi,\pi] because ff is 2π2\pi-periodic). Subtracting and taking absolute values gives, for every xx, \[\lvert (f \ast K_n)(x) - f(x) \rvert \le \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} K_n(t)\,\lvert f(x-t) - f(x) \rvert\,dt.\] Split the integral into ∣t∣<δ\lvert t \rvert < \delta and δ≤∣t∣≤π\delta \le \lvert t \rvert \le \pi.
  2. Let ε>0\varepsilon > 0. As a continuous periodic function, ff is uniformly continuous on R\mathbb{R}: there is δ>0\delta > 0 such that ∣t∣<δ\lvert t \rvert < \delta implies ∣f(x−t)−f(x)∣<ε/2\lvert f(x-t) - f(x) \rvert < \varepsilon/2 for all xx. Since Kn≥0K_n \ge 0 with mass 11, the first integral is ≤ε/2\le \varepsilon/2, independently of xx.
  3. The tail integral is bounded via ∣f(x−t)−f(x)∣≤2∥f∥∞\lvert f(x-t) - f(x) \rvert \le 2\lVert f \rVert_\infty: \[\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{\delta \le \lvert t \rvert \le \pi} K_n(t)\,\lvert f(x-t) - f(x) \rvert\,dt \le 2\lVert f \rVert_\infty \cdot \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{\delta \le \lvert t \rvert \le \pi} K_n(t)\,dt \to 0\] as n→∞n \to \infty, by hypothesis (ii). So for large nn the tail is <ε/2<\varepsilon/2 independently of xx. Together, ∥f∗Kn−f∥∞<ε\lVert f \ast K_n - f \rVert_\infty < \varepsilon — uniform convergence. The Fejér kernel KNK_N satisfies KN≥0K_N \ge 0, mass 11, and the tail bound KN(t)≤1Nsin⁡2(δ/2)K_N(t) \le \dfrac{1}{N\sin^2(\delta/2)} on δ≤∣t∣≤π\delta \le \lvert t \rvert \le \pi (the Fejér scene's problems), so Fejér's theorem is a corollary of this general result.