Prove that is irrational.
Show proof
First, : , and since for , . So if then .
is an integer, and so is . Put ; then , so .
But with is not an integer β a contradiction. Hence is irrational.
Two roads lead to e β which one gets there faster?
The compound-growth road creeps forward step by step. The factorial series has terms that shrink almost instantly. A handful of terms already pins down many digits.
For example, think of π° money in a π· piggy bank earning interest on its interest. More rounds push it toward e, but the series arrives far sooner.
Prove that is irrational.
First, : , and since for , . So if then .
is an integer, and so is . Put ; then , so .
But with is not an integer β a contradiction. Hence is irrational.
Prove, for , the remainder bound .
Assume (for , is undefined and the geometric bound below is invalid). .
The bracket is less than (geometric series).
Hence . This estimate is exactly why the factorial series wins by a landslide.
Show increases toward from below.
Put . By the binomial theorem , and since (empty product for ), with .
Termwise comparison: for fixed and , (larger subtracts less), so β and for the factor is strictly smaller, giving . All terms are positive.
The exact difference is .
Every difference and the extra term , so .
For the difference also contributes positively.
The case is checked directly: and , so (the term does not exist in the sum, so applying the gain at would double-count ).
So is strictly increasing.
Each factor satisfies .
For the product is empty, so ; for the only factor is , giving , so β equality holds.
For the factor is strictly below , so .
Hence (equality only for ), and β stays below , and its limit satisfies .
It remains to show the limit is exactly .
Fix ; for , .
For fixed , as each factor , so .
Hence for every , and letting gives .
Combined with from the previous step, β increases to from below.