Two Roads to e

Two roads lead to e β€” which one gets there faster?

The compound-growth road creeps forward step by step. The factorial series has terms that shrink almost instantly. A handful of terms already pins down many digits.

For example, think of πŸ’° money in a 🐷 piggy bank earning interest on its interest. More rounds push it toward e, but the series arrives far sooner.

e=βˆ‘k=0∞1k!e=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{k!}
e=lim⁑nβ†’βˆž(1+1n)ne=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^n

Examples & Exercises

Prove that ee is irrational.

0<q!(eβˆ’βˆ‘k=0q1k!)<10 < q!\left(e - \sum_{k=0}^{q}\frac{1}{k!}\right) < 1
n=10n = 10: the series is already within 3Γ—10βˆ’83\times 10^{-8} of ee.
Show proof
  1. First, 2<e<32 < e < 3: e=βˆ‘k=0∞1k!>1+1=2e = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{k!} > 1+1 = 2, and since k!β‰₯2kβˆ’1k! \ge 2^{k-1} for kβ‰₯1k \ge 1, e<1+1+12+14+β‹―=3e < 1+1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{4}+\cdots = 3. So if e=pqe = \frac{p}{q} then qβ‰₯2q \ge 2.

  2. q!e=(qβˆ’1)! pq!e = (q-1)!\,p is an integer, and so is βˆ‘k=0qq!k!\sum_{k=0}^{q}\frac{q!}{k!}. Put T=q!(eβˆ’βˆ‘k=0q1k!)T = q!\left(e - \sum_{k=0}^{q}\frac{1}{k!}\right); then T=1q+1+1(q+1)(q+2)+β‹―T = \frac{1}{q+1}+\frac{1}{(q+1)(q+2)}+\cdots, so 0<T<1q+1(1+1q+1+⋯ )=1q≀12<10 < T < \frac{1}{q+1}\left(1+\frac{1}{q+1}+\cdots\right) = \frac{1}{q} \le \frac{1}{2} < 1.

  3. But q!e=(integer)+Tq!e = \text{(integer)} + T with 0<T<10 < T < 1 is not an integer β€” a contradiction. Hence ee is irrational.

Prove, for nβ‰₯1n \ge 1, the remainder bound Rn=βˆ‘k>n1k!<1nβ‹…n!R_n = \sum_{k>n}\frac{1}{k!} < \frac{1}{n\cdot n!}.

Rn<1(n+1)!(1+1n+1+1(n+1)2+⋯ )=1nβ‹…n!R_n < \frac{1}{(n+1)!}\left(1+\frac{1}{n+1}+\frac{1}{(n+1)^2}+\cdots\right)=\frac{1}{n\cdot n!}
n=10n = 10: actual remainder β‰ˆ2.73Γ—10βˆ’8\approx 2.73\times 10^{-8}, bound β‰ˆ2.76Γ—10βˆ’8\approx 2.76\times 10^{-8}.
Show proof
  1. Assume nβ‰₯1n \ge 1 (for n=0n = 0, 1nβ‹…n!\frac{1}{n \cdot n!} is undefined and the geometric bound n+1n\frac{n+1}{n} below is invalid). Rn=1(n+1)!+1(n+2)!+β‹―=1(n+1)!(1+1n+2+1(n+2)(n+3)+⋯ )R_n = \frac{1}{(n+1)!}+\frac{1}{(n+2)!}+\cdots = \frac{1}{(n+1)!}\left(1+\frac{1}{n+2}+\frac{1}{(n+2)(n+3)}+\cdots\right).

  2. The bracket is less than 1+1n+1+1(n+1)2+β‹―=n+1n1+\frac{1}{n+1}+\frac{1}{(n+1)^2}+\cdots = \frac{n+1}{n} (geometric series).

  3. Hence Rn<1(n+1)!β‹…n+1n=1nβ‹…n!R_n < \frac{1}{(n+1)!}\cdot\frac{n+1}{n} = \frac{1}{n\cdot n!}. This estimate is exactly why the factorial series wins by a landslide.

Show (1+1n)n\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^n increases toward ee from below.

(1+1n)n=βˆ‘k=0n1k!∏j=0kβˆ’1(1βˆ’jn)<e\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^n = \sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{1}{k!}\prod_{j=0}^{k-1}\left(1-\frac{j}{n}\right) < e
sn+1βˆ’sn=βˆ‘k=0n(an+1,kβˆ’an,k)+an+1,n+1>0s_{n+1} - s_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} (a_{n+1,k} - a_{n,k}) + a_{n+1,n+1} > 0
n=30n = 30: the compounding road is still far below ee.
Show proof
  1. Put sn=(1+1n)ns_n = \left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^n. By the binomial theorem sn=βˆ‘k=0n(nk)1nks_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}\frac{1}{n^k}, and since (nk)1nk=1k!∏j=0kβˆ’1(1βˆ’jn)\binom{n}{k}\frac{1}{n^k} = \frac{1}{k!}\prod_{j=0}^{k-1}\left(1-\frac{j}{n}\right) (empty product =1= 1 for k=0k = 0), sn=βˆ‘k=0nan,ks_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} a_{n,k} with an,k=1k!∏j=0kβˆ’1(1βˆ’jn)a_{n,k} = \frac{1}{k!}\prod_{j=0}^{k-1}\left(1-\frac{j}{n}\right).

  2. Termwise comparison: for fixed kβ‰₯1k \ge 1 and 0<j≀kβˆ’10 < j \le k-1, (1βˆ’jn)<(1βˆ’jn+1)\left(1-\frac{j}{n}\right) < \left(1-\frac{j}{n+1}\right) (larger nn subtracts less), so an,k≀an+1,ka_{n,k} \le a_{n+1,k} β€” and for kβ‰₯2k \ge 2 the factor j=1j = 1 is strictly smaller, giving an,k<an+1,ka_{n,k} < a_{n+1,k}. All terms are positive.

  3. The exact difference is sn+1βˆ’sn=βˆ‘k=0n(an+1,kβˆ’an,k)+an+1,n+1s_{n+1} - s_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} (a_{n+1,k} - a_{n,k}) + a_{n+1,n+1}.

    Every difference an+1,kβˆ’an,kβ‰₯0a_{n+1,k} - a_{n,k} \ge 0 and the extra term an+1,n+1>0a_{n+1,n+1} > 0, so sn+1βˆ’sn>0s_{n+1} - s_n > 0.

    For nβ‰₯2n \ge 2 the k=2k = 2 difference an+1,2βˆ’an,2>0a_{n+1,2} - a_{n,2} > 0 also contributes positively.

    The case n=1n = 1 is checked directly: s1=1+1=2s_1 = 1 + 1 = 2 and s2=1+1+14=2.25s_2 = 1 + 1 + \frac{1}{4} = 2.25, so s2βˆ’s1=14>0s_2 - s_1 = \frac{1}{4} > 0 (the term a1,2a_{1,2} does not exist in the n=1n = 1 sum, so applying the k=2k = 2 gain at n=1n = 1 would double-count a2,2a_{2,2}).

    So sns_n is strictly increasing.

  4. Each factor satisfies (1βˆ’jn)≀1\left(1-\frac{j}{n}\right) \le 1.

    For k=0k = 0 the product is empty, so an,0=10!=1a_{n,0} = \frac{1}{0!} = 1; for k=1k = 1 the only factor is j=0j = 0, giving 11, so an,1=11!=1a_{n,1} = \frac{1}{1!} = 1 β€” equality holds.

    For kβ‰₯2k \ge 2 the factor j=1j = 1 is strictly below 11, so an,k<1k!a_{n,k} < \frac{1}{k!}.

    Hence an,k≀1k!a_{n,k} \le \frac{1}{k!} (equality only for k=0,1k = 0, 1), and snβ‰€βˆ‘k=0n1k!<βˆ‘k=0∞1k!=es_n \le \sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{1}{k!} < \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{k!} = e β€” sns_n stays below ee, and its limit L=lim⁑snL = \lim s_n satisfies L≀eL \le e.

  5. It remains to show the limit is exactly ee.

    Fix KK; for nβ‰₯Kn \ge K, snβ‰₯βˆ‘k=0Kan,ks_n \ge \sum_{k=0}^{K} a_{n,k}.

    For fixed kk, as nβ†’βˆžn \to \infty each factor (1βˆ’jn)β†’1\left(1-\frac{j}{n}\right) \to 1, so an,kβ†’1k!a_{n,k} \to \frac{1}{k!}.

    Hence Lβ‰₯βˆ‘k=0K1k!L \ge \sum_{k=0}^{K} \frac{1}{k!} for every KK, and letting Kβ†’βˆžK \to \infty gives Lβ‰₯eL \ge e.

    Combined with L≀eL \le e from the previous step, L=eL = e β€” sns_n increases to ee from below.

8. Power Series