See a complex number as a point in the plane. The real part runs sideways, the imaginary part runs up.
The modulus is the distance from the origin to that point. Adding two complex numbers draws the diagonal of a parallelogram. That diagonal is never longer than the two sides added together. This is the triangle inequality.
For example, walk 3 steps east with a π§ compass, then turn and walk 4 more. The straight-line distance back is shorter than the bent path. The modulus measures exactly that straight line.
β£zβ£=a2+b2β(z=a+bi)
β£z+wβ£β€β£zβ£+β£wβ£
Examples & Exercises
Prove completely that for all complex numbers z,wβC, the triangle inequality β£z+wβ£β€β£zβ£+β£wβ£ holds.
Start, without hints, by expanding β£z+wβ£2 through the conjugate.
β£z+wβ£β€β£zβ£+β£wβ£(z,wβC)
z=1.2+0.8i, w=β0.6+1.1i: β£z+wβ£=3.97ββ1.992 while β£zβ£+β£wβ£β2.695, a slack of about 0.703.Show proof
First expand β£z+wβ£2 using β£ΞΆβ£2=ΞΆΞΆΛβ for ΞΆβC. Since z+wβ=zΛ+wΛ,
For any complex number ΞΆ, ΞΆ+ΞΆΛβ=2ReΞΆ; taking ΞΆ=zwΛ gives
β£z+wβ£2=β£zβ£2+2Re(zwΛ)+β£wβ£2.
Next, a lemma: ReΞΆβ€β£ΞΆβ£ for every ΞΆβC.
Proof: write ΞΆ=u+vi with u,vβR. Then ReΞΆ=uβ€β£uβ£=u2ββ€u2+v2β=β£ΞΆβ£, where the middle step uses u2β€u2+v2 (as v2β₯0) and the monotonicity of the square root.
Hence Re(zwΛ)β€β£zwΛβ£.
Now compute β£zwΛβ£=β£zβ£β£wβ£ directly. Both sides are β₯0, so it suffices to compare squares:
Why this identity is a bridge: by the Jordan-von Neumann theorem, a norm satisfying the parallelogram law for all vectors is exactly a norm coming from an inner product β this computation in C is the seed of that direction, and it returns in the parallelogram-law scene of the sequences chapter.
Prove completely that for all z,wβC: (i) β£zwβ£=β£zβ£β£wβ£, (ii) z+wβ=zΛ+wΛ, (iii) zw=zΛwΛ, and (iv) zzΛ=β£zβ£2.
Write z=a+bi and w=c+di with a,b,c,dβR and carry out the component computations explicitly.