An increasing sequence blocked from above climbs to the very top. The scene also watches the tail squeeze into a single point.
Bounded above, the sequence has nowhere to go but its highest allowed spot. That spot is the supremum, and the sequence converges to it. Cut to the tail and the remaining terms spread less and less. A sequence whose spread dies to 0 is a Cauchy sequence. Every convergent sequence is Cauchy.
For example, drop coins into a 🐷 piggy bank: half the goal, then half of what remains, and so on. The total creeps toward the goal without ever jumping to it. The coins added later also differ from each other less and less.
an=1−2−n↑1
m,k≥Nmax∣am−ak∣→0
Examples & Exercises
Show an=1−n1 is increasing with sup=1, and conclude an→1 from the Monotone Convergence Theorem.
an+1−an=n(n+1)1>0,supan=1
n=8 terms: for this problem's sequence, a8=1−81=0.875. The scene displays 1−2−n (0.99609375 at n=8), which approaches 1 the same way.Show proof
(Monotone) an+1−an=(1−n+11)−(1−n1)=n1−n+11=n(n+1)1>0, so the sequence increases.
(Bounded) an=1−n1<1 for every n, so 1 is an upper bound. For any real u<1, 1−n1>u⟺n>1−u1, and such an n exists by the Archimedean property, so u is not an upper bound.
Hence supan=1.
By the Monotone Convergence Theorem (cited), an increasing bounded-above sequence converges to its supremum, so an→1.
Numerically: at n=40, a40=1−401=0.975, already within 0.025 of the limit 1.
Prove that every Cauchy sequence is bounded.
m≥N⇒∣am∣≤∣aN∣+1
Tail start 6 — past N the tail is trapped in a band of radius 1.Show proof
Let (an) be Cauchy. For ε=1 there is N with ∣am−an∣<1 whenever m,n≥N.
Fix this N.
For m≥N, the triangle inequality gives ∣am∣≤∣aN∣+∣am−aN∣<∣aN∣+1 — the whole tail is bound by one number.
The head a1,…,aN−1 has finitely many terms, so with M=max(∣a1∣,…,∣aN−1∣,∣aN∣+1) we have ∣an∣≤M for every n. Hence (an) is bounded.
Numerically: for this scene's an=1−2−n, N=1 works for ε=1 (since ∣am−a1∣<21<1), and M=∣a1∣+1=1.5 bounds everything.
Prove that the partial sums sN=∑k=1N2−k form a Cauchy sequence.
sN=1−2−N,∣sm−sn∣=2−n−2−m<2−n
The partial sums are exactly this scene's sequence: ∑k=1n2−k=1−2−n.Show proof
Geometric sum: (1−21)∑k=1N2−k=∑k=1N(2−k−2−(k+1))=21−2−(N+1) (telescoping), so sN=1−2−N.
For m>n, the same telescoping gives sm−sn=∑k=n+1m2−k=2−n−2−m, so ∣sm−sn∣=2−n−2−m<2−n.
Given ε>0, choose N with 2−N<ε (N>log2ε1). Let m,n≥N.
If m=n then ∣sm−sn∣=0<ε. Otherwise, by symmetry ∣sm−sn∣=∣sn−sm∣, so assume without loss of generality m>n; step 2 then gives ∣sm−sn∣<2−n≤2−N<ε. Hence (sN) is Cauchy.
Numerically: with tail start 4 and indices ≤12, the tail diameter is 2−4−2−12=0.0625−0.000244140625=0.062255859375 — matching the scene's readout.