This scene tackles limits that look like 0 divided by 0. Differentiate top and bottom separately and the limit appears.
When both sides shrink to zero, amounts stop deciding the ratio. What matters is which one shrinks faster. Comparing the two speeds gives the answer.
For example, when two puddles of π§ water both dry up, their remaining ratio is not set by the starting amounts. It is set by the ratio of their drying speeds.
xβ158.5 (an β/β form): xlnxββ0.0320, x1ββ0.00631 β dragging right, both stick to 0.Show proof
First the β/β lemma: suppose f,g are continuous on [A0β,β) and differentiable on (A0β,β) with gβ²ξ =0, g(x)ββ, and gβ²(x)fβ²(x)ββL (finite). Here A0β is the fixed threshold from the derivative-limit hypothesis.
For a working Aβ₯A0β and x>A, Cauchy's theorem on [A,x] (continuity on [A,x], differentiability on (A,x)) gives g(x)βg(A)f(x)βf(A)β=gβ²(ΞΎxβ)fβ²(ΞΎxβ)β for some ΞΎxββ(A,x). Moreover gβ²ξ =0 forces g to be strictly monotone by Rolle's theorem: if g(x)=g(A) then Rolle would give a zero of gβ².
Hence g(x)ξ =g(A) for x>A, justifying the division.
The key identity, shifted by L: g(x)f(x)ββL=(gβ²(ΞΎxβ)fβ²(ΞΎxβ)ββL)(1βg(x)g(A)β)+g(x)f(A)βLg(A)β. Given Ξ΅>0, first fix A0β from the derivative-limit hypothesis so that βgβ²(t)fβ²(t)ββLβ<4Ξ΅β for t>A0β. Then choose the working Aβ₯A0β (the role of A is distinct from A0β: A is the point frozen in the bounds below); then ΞΎxβ>Aβ₯A0β makes the first factor below 4Ξ΅β.
Since g(x)ββ, for large x we have βg(x)g(A)ββ<1, hence β1βg(x)g(A)βββ€1+βg(x)g(A)ββ<2. The first term is at most 4Ξ΅ββ 2=2Ξ΅β, and the second term β£g(x)β£β£f(A)βLg(A)β£β drops below 2Ξ΅β for large x.
Together, βg(x)f(x)ββLβ<Ξ΅; with Ξ΅ arbitrary, g(x)f(x)ββL β L'HΓ΄pital's rule for the β/β case.
Apply this to f(x)=lnx and g(x)=x: gβ²(x)=1ξ =0, g(x)ββ, and gβ²(x)fβ²(x)β=11/xβ=x1ββ0. Hence limxβββxlnxβ=0.
Prove limxβ0+βxlnx=0. (Hint: rewrite it as 1/xlnxβ.)
The same β/β machinery β at x=1000, xlnxββ0.00691, x1β=0.001. Rewriting xlnx=1/xlnxβ gives gβ²fβ²β=βxβ0 (e.g. at x=0.01, xlnxββ0.0461, βx=β0.01).Show proof
For x>0, xlnx=1/xlnxβ. Put f(x)=lnx and g(x)=1/x: then f(x)βββ and g(x)β+β, an β/β form, and gβ²(x)=βx21βξ =0.
gβ²(x)fβ²(x)β=β1/x21/xβ=βxxβ0+β0. Restate problem 2's lemma in the flipped direction and re-verify its bounds: for fixed A and 0<x<A, Cauchy's theorem on [x,A] (again gβ²ξ =0 gives g(x)ξ =g(A) by Rolle) yields the same identity g(x)f(x)ββL=(gβ²(ΞΎ)fβ²(ΞΎ)ββL)(1βg(x)g(A)β)+g(x)f(A)βLg(A)β with L=0 and ΞΎβ(x,A).
As xβ0+, β£g(x)β£=1/xββ, so for the fixed A, β1βg(x)g(A)ββ<2 for small x, and β£g(x)β£β£f(A)βLg(A)β£β<2Ξ΅β for small x β the fixed-A terms are small because β£g(x)β£ββ. Choosing A small first so βgβ²(t)fβ²(t)ββLβ<4Ξ΅β for tβ(0,A) makes the first term at most 2Ξ΅β, giving βg(x)f(x)ββLβ<Ξ΅.
Hence limxβ0+β1/xlnxβ=0.
Hence limxβ0+βxlnx=0. The numbers agree: at x=0.01, xlnx=0.01β ln0.01ββ0.0461 and the derivative ratio is βx=β0.01, both tending to 0 as xβ0+.