Only the seller knows the car's quality.
The buyer sets the price by the average.
At an average price, good-car owners refuse to sell.
Only bad cars remain, so the price falls further.
As the price unravels like this, trade itself disappears.
For example, there are 10 used 🚗 cars.
A good one is worth 10 million won.
A bad one is worth 1 million won.
The buyer cannot tell them apart and offers the average, 5.5 million.
Then every good-car owner walks away.
Seeing only bad cars left, the buyer lowers the price again.
🚗 Car quality q is uniform on [0,1]; the seller values a car at q and the buyer at mq, with m=1.5.
Find the buyer's willingness to pay WTP(p) at price p, and show that the market fully unravels so that p∗=0 is the unique equilibrium.
WTP(p)=m⋅2p​=0.75p
pn+1​=0.75pn​,p0​=1
m=1.5 — willingness to pay lies below the 45-degree line; the market unravels to p=0.Show proof
At price p only sellers with q≤p offer, so the average quality offered is p/2.
Hence WTP(p)=1.5â‹…p/2=0.75p.
For every p>0, WTP(p)=0.75p<p, so p∗=0 is the only solution of WTP(p)=p.
The unraveling iterates are pn+1​=0.75pn​: 1→0.75→0.5625→0.421875→0.316406→⋯→0. The traded fraction is p∗=0, so nothing trades.
Full-information total surplus is E[(m−1)q]=0.5/2=0.25. With no trade in equilibrium the welfare loss is also 0.25 — the entire gains from trade vanish.
loss=2m−1​−2(m−1)(p∗)2​=0.25−0=0.25
In the same model with m=2, verify the full-trade equilibrium p∗=1
and compute the traded fraction and the welfare loss.
WTP(p)=2⋅2p​=p
m=2 — willingness to pay coincides with the 45-degree line; full trade holds at p∗=1.Show proof
With m=2, WTP(p)=p, so the unraveling process stalls: pn+1​=pn​, i.e. 1→1→1→⋯. The equilibrium price is p∗=1.
Every seller (q≤1) offers, so the traded fraction is 1. Traded surplus is (m−1)(p∗)2/2=0.5, equal to the full-information surplus (m−1)/2=0.5, so the welfare loss is 0 — adverse selection disappears.