Akerlof's Lemons Market

Good cars vanish from a used-car market.

Only the seller knows the car's quality. The buyer sets the price by the average. At an average price, good-car owners refuse to sell. Only bad cars remain, so the price falls further. As the price unravels like this, trade itself disappears.

For example, there are 10 used 🚗 cars. A good one is worth 10 million won. A bad one is worth 1 million won. The buyer cannot tell them apart and offers the average, 5.5 million. Then every good-car owner walks away. Seeing only bad cars left, the buyer lowers the price again.

WTP(p)=mâ‹…p2WTP(p) = m \cdot \frac{p}{2}
pn+1=m2pn  →  0(m<2)p_{n+1} = \frac{m}{2} p_n \;\to\; 0 \quad (m < 2)

Part of these learning paths

Examples & Exercises

🚗 Car quality qq is uniform on [0,1][0, 1]; the seller values a car at qq and the buyer at mqmq, with m=1.5m = 1.5.

Find the buyer's willingness to pay WTP(p)WTP(p) at price pp, and show that the market fully unravels so that p∗=0p^* = 0 is the unique equilibrium.

WTP(p)=m⋅p2=0.75 pWTP(p) = m \cdot \frac{p}{2} = 0.75\,p
pn+1=0.75 pn,p0=1p_{n+1} = 0.75\,p_n, \qquad p_0 = 1
m=1.5m = 1.5 — willingness to pay lies below the 45-degree line; the market unravels to p=0p = 0.
Show proof
  1. At price pp only sellers with q≤pq \le p offer, so the average quality offered is p/2p/2.

    Hence WTP(p)=1.5â‹…p/2=0.75pWTP(p) = 1.5 \cdot p/2 = 0.75p.

    For every p>0p > 0, WTP(p)=0.75p<pWTP(p) = 0.75p < p, so p∗=0p^* = 0 is the only solution of WTP(p)=pWTP(p) = p.

  2. The unraveling iterates are pn+1=0.75 pnp_{n+1} = 0.75\,p_n: 1→0.75→0.5625→0.421875→0.316406→⋯→01 \to 0.75 \to 0.5625 \to 0.421875 \to 0.316406 \to \cdots \to 0. The traded fraction is p∗=0p^* = 0, so nothing trades.

  3. Full-information total surplus is E[(m−1)q]=0.5/2=0.25E[(m-1)q] = 0.5/2 = 0.25. With no trade in equilibrium the welfare loss is also 0.250.25 — the entire gains from trade vanish.

    loss=m−12−(m−1)(p∗)22=0.25−0=0.25\text{loss} = \frac{m-1}{2} - \frac{(m-1)(p^*)^2}{2} = 0.25 - 0 = 0.25

In the same model with m=2m = 2, verify the full-trade equilibrium p∗=1p^* = 1

and compute the traded fraction and the welfare loss.

WTP(p)=2â‹…p2=pWTP(p) = 2 \cdot \frac{p}{2} = p
m=2m = 2 — willingness to pay coincides with the 45-degree line; full trade holds at p∗=1p^* = 1.
Show proof
  1. With m=2m = 2, WTP(p)=pWTP(p) = p, so the unraveling process stalls: pn+1=pnp_{n+1} = p_n, i.e. 1→1→1→⋯1 \to 1 \to 1 \to \cdots. The equilibrium price is p∗=1p^* = 1.

  2. Every seller (q≤1q \le 1) offers, so the traded fraction is 11. Traded surplus is (m−1)(p∗)2/2=0.5(m-1)(p^*)^2/2 = 0.5, equal to the full-information surplus (m−1)/2=0.5(m-1)/2 = 0.5, so the welfare loss is 00 — adverse selection disappears.

19. Adverse Selection and Signaling