In micro, the question was whether one person saves. In macro, the stage is a market where the whole country pools its saving.
The interest rate is the price of borrowed money. A higher rate coaxes out more saving. It also scares off borrowers who wanted to invest. Where the two meet, as the formulas below show, sits the equilibrium rate. A government deficit eats into the pool, pushes the rate up, and crowds private investment out.
For example, imagine all your classmates pool their 🐷 piggy-bank 💰 money in one box. If many friends want to borrow and money is scarce, the charge goes up. If the teacher borrows big first, less is left for everyone else.
With no deficit, equilibrium is r∗=(I0−S0)/(s+b)=(100−40)/(4+6)=6 and investment is I=100−6⋅6=64. The deficit 20 shifts total saving left by that much, so r∗=(100−40+20)/10=8.
At the new rate, investment is I=100−6⋅8=52. The crowded-out amount is given by the formula below — not the whole deficit, only 12.
The higher rate coaxes household saving from 64 up to 72, covering the other 8.
Even so, saving = investment shrinks from 64 to 52.
ΔI=−bD/(s+b)=−6⋅20/10=−12
Households tighten their belts and base saving rises from S0=40 to 60 (there is no deficit).
The saving curve shifts right, so equilibrium is r∗=(100−60)/(4+6)=4 — down 2 points from the old 6. When loanable money is plentiful, its price, the interest rate, falls.
Investment becomes I=100−6⋅4=76, up 12 from the old 64. In this market, extra saving turns into exactly extra investment — the rise in saving, 76−64=12, matches to the last unit.