Saving rate 0.4 — steady state k∗=16, y∗=4, c∗=2.4.Show solution
Counterexample and verification
For s=0.2: y∗=2 and k∗=4, so replacing worn machines costs δk∗=0.4 and c∗=2−0.4=1.6.
For s=0.4: y∗=4, k∗=16, replacement costs 1.6, and c∗=4−1.6=2.4.
Up to here, saving more does mean eating more.
But at s=0.8, y∗=8 and k∗=64, replacement alone eats 6.4, and c∗=8−6.4=1.6 — back down again.
Pile up too many machines and most of the output leaks into maintaining them.
Steady-state consumption peaks at s=0.5, where c∗=2.5.
Hard
2Hard
A household with interest rate r=0.04 and income y=4 holds assets a=10.
Find its optimal next-period assets for patience β=0.80, 0.90, and 0.95, then find the smallest β (on a two-decimal grid) at which this household stops running its assets down.
Reading the value-iteration policy at assets 10: β=0.80 gives a′=4 (consumption 10.4), β=0.90 gives a′=7 (consumption 7.4), and β=0.95 gives a′=9 (consumption 5.4). Resources are 14.4 in all three cases — each step of patience moves food from today's plate to tomorrow's storehouse.
Not running assets down requires a′≥10.
At β=0.95, a′=9 still falls one step short; at β=0.96, a′=10 (consumption 4.4) holds the line for the first time.
The border sits near where β(1+r)=1, that is β=1/1.04≈0.9615: the point where patience, grossed up by the interest rate, exactly balances.